Oxygen-19 β- decays. What is the daughter nucleus, and what may be said of the kinetic energy of the emittedβ- particle?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The daughter particle is F19.

The kinetic energy released is |4.82MeV|.

Step by step solution

01

Given data 

The β+decay of Oxygen-19.

713N613C++10β++v

Atomic mass of 713N,mN=13.005738u.

Atomic mass of 613C,mC=13.003355u.

02

Concept of Energy released during Electron Capture

During electron capture the amount of energy released is dependent on the mass difference between parent and the daughter nucleus.

Which is, Q=(mparentmdaughter)c2.

Where,mparentis atomic mass of parent nucleus andmdaughter is atomic mass daughter nucleus.

03

Determine the Kinetic Energy and Daughter Nucleus 

Oxygen 19 in beta decay will lose an electron and thus gain a charge, so one of the neutrons will become proton.

So it will become F-19.

819O10c+919F

So the daughter particle is F19.

TheQ factor is:

Q=(mparentmdaughter)c2=(m0mF)(931.5MeV/u)=(19.003577u18.998403u)(931.5MeV/u)=4.82MeV

The daughter particle is F-19.

The kinetic energy released is |4.82MeV|.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Glancing at the binding energy per nucleon plot of Figure 11.14– with its maximum around iron Z=26––it might naively be argued that fission would be favorable for any nucleus of about Z = 52 or higher. Show that the Tellurium – 130 broke into two iron- 56 nuclei, freeing the excess neutrons, the total binding energy would actually decreases.Explain what is wrong with the naïve argument.

Question:In Section 11.2, it is said that iron and nickel represent maximum stability. Chemistry emphasizes that helium is the most stable element? How can these claims be reconciled?

Certain nuclei with half-lives between days and a few years are found in nature in small abundances that do not change at all over many, many years. How is this possible? (Hint: Natural uranium and thorium have very long half lives.)

Calculate the binding energy per nucleon of technetium -98 .

You occupy a one-dimensional world in which beads of mass m0 when isolated-attract each other if and only if in contact. Were the beads to interact solely by this attraction, it would take energyH to break the contact. Consequently. We could extract this much energy by sticking two together. However, they also share a repulsive force, no matter what their separation. For which the potential energy isU(r)=0.85Ha/r . Whererole="math" localid="1660033271423" a is a bead's radius andr is centre to centre separation. The closer the beads. The higher is this energy.

(a) For one stationary bead, by how much does the energy differ fromm0c2?

(b) For two stationary beads in contact, by how much does the energy differ from 2m0c2?

(c) For three beads in contact (in a line, of course, since this world is one-dimensional). by how much does the energy differ from3m022 ?

(d) For four beads in contact, by how much does the energy differ from 4m0c2?

(e) If you had 12 isolated beads and wished to extract the most energy by sticking them together (in linear groupings), into sets of what number would you group them?

(f) Sets of what number would be suitable fuel for the release of fusion energy? Or fission energy?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free