In general, we might say that the wavelengths allowed a bound particle are those of a typical standing wave,λ=2L/n , where is the length of its home. Given that λ=h/p, we would have p=nh/2L, and the kinetic energy, p2/2m, would thus be n2h2/8mL2. These are actually the correct infinite well energies, for the argumentis perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0 (inside the well) and is strictly constant. But it is a pretty good guide to how the energies should go in other cases. The length allowed the wave should be roughly the region classically allowed to the particle, which depends on the “height” of the total energy E relative to the potential energy (cf. Figure 4). The “wall” is the classical turning point, where there is nokinetic energy left: E=U. Treating it as essentially a one-dimensional (radial) problem, apply these arguments to the hydrogen atom potential energy (10). Find the location of the classical turning point in terms of E , use twice this distance for (the electron can be on both on sides of the origin), and from this obtain an expression for the expected average kinetic energies in terms of E . For the average potential, use its value at half the distance from the origin to the turning point, again in terms of . Then write out the expected average total energy and solve for E . What do you obtain

for the quantized energies?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The energies of a particle trapped inside a Hydrogen atom are E=6me4n2h2π2ε02

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The momentum of a particle classically bound in a region of length L is

p=nh2L ..... (I)

Here h is the Planck's constant.

02

Hydrogen atom potential energy

The potential energy of a Hydrogen atom of radius r is

U=-e24πε0r ..... (II)

Here e is the magnitude of charge of an electron and ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

03

Step 3:Determining the total energy of a particle stuck inside a Hydrogen atom radius

From equation (II) the radius at which the kinetic energy is zero is

E=e24πε0rmaxrmax=e24πε0E

The classically allowed region is twice this value, that is

L=2rmax=2e24πε0E=e22πε0E

From equation (I), the momentum is

p=nh2×e22πε0E=nhπε0Ee2

The kinetic energy is

T=p22m=nhπε0Ee222m=n2h2π2ε02E22me4

From equation (II), the potential energy at half the classical limit is

Ur=rmax2=-e24πε0rmax2=-e24πε0×12×e24πε0E=-2E

The total energy is then

E=T+U=n2h2π2ε02E22me4-2E3E=n2h2π2ε02E22me4E=6me4n2h2π2ε02

Thus the quantized energies are E=6me4n2h2π2ε02.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 81 obtained formulas for hydrogen like atoms in which the nucleus is not assumed infinite, as in the chapter, but is of massm1, whilem2is the mass of the orbiting negative charge. In positronium, an electron orbits a single positive charge, as in hydrogen, but one whose mass is the same as that of the electron -- a positron. Obtain numerical values of the ground state energy and “Bohr radius” of positronium.

For states where l = n - t the radial probability assumes the general form given in Exercise 54. The proportionality constant that normalizes this radial probability is given in Exercise 64.

(a) Show that the expectation value of the hydrogen atom potential energy is exactly twice the total energy. (It turns out that this holds no matter what l may be)

(b) Argue that the expectation value of the kinetic energy must be the negative of the total energy.

A mathematical solution of the azimuthal equation (7-22) is Φ(φ)=Ae-+Be- , which applies when D is negative, (a) Show that this simply cannot meet itself smoothly when it finishes a round trip about the z-axis. The simplest approach is to consider φ=0 and φ=2π. (b) If D were 0, equation (7-22) would say simply that the second derivative Φ(φ)of is 0. Argue than this too leads to physically unacceptable solution, except in the special case of Φ(φ) being constant, which is covered by the ml=0 , case of solutions (7-24).

The space between two parallel metal plates is filled with an element in a gaseous stale. Electrons leave one plate at negligible speed and are accelerated toward the other by a potential differenceVapplied between the plates. As Vis increased from 0, the electron current increases more or less linearly, but when Vreaches 4.9 V , the current drops precipitously. From nearly 0 , it builds again roughly linearly as Vis increased beyond 4.9 V .

(a) How can the presence of the gas explain these observations?

(b) The Gas emits pure “light” when Vexceeds 4.9 V . What is its wavelength?

We have noted that for a given energy, as lincreases, the motion is more like a circle at a constant radius, with the rotational energy increasing as the radial energy correspondingly decreases. But is the radial kinetic energy 0 for the largest lvalues? Calculate the ratio of expectation values, radial energy to rotational energy, for the(n,l,mt)=(2.1,+1)state. Use the operators

KErad=-h22m1r2r(rr)KErad=h2l(l+1)2mr2

Which we deduce from equation (7-30).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free