An electron is in anI = 3state of the hydrogen atom, what possible angles might the angular momentum vector make with the z-axis.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The possible angles that the angular momentum vector makes with the z-axis are

θ=150°,125.3°,106.8°,90°,73.2°,54.7°,30°..

Step by step solution

01

Value of Angular momentum:

The azimuthal quantum number defines the orbital angular momentum and the shape of the orbital. While magnetic quantum number determines the orientation of the orbital in space.

Consider the given data as below.

I = 3

As you know, angular momentum = L = L=I(I+I)×h

Where, is the Azimuthal Quantum number and Plank’s constant that is 1.055×10-34J.s..

Here, if I = 3 the angular momentum is,

role="math" localid="1659324698388" L=33+1×h=12hL=3.46h.........(1)

02

Values of  Lz  (z  – component of angular momentum):

If : I = 3

Thenthe magnetic quantum number is,

ml=0,±1±2±3

Hence, possible z-components are,

Lz=0,±h,±2h,±3h

03

Conclusion:

You will be finding all the possible angles using the below equation

Lz=Lcosθ ….. (3)

Where, θis the angle of angular momentum vector from z- axis.

Now, by using equations (1) and (2) in equation (3), you get the following.

Substitute 3.46h for L and 0 for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

localid="1659325137879" 0=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=0θ=cos-1(0)θ=90°

Substitute 3.46 for L and h for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

localid="1659325202540" h=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=0.289θ=cos-1(0.289)θ=73.2°

Substitute 3.46h for L and -h for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

-h=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=-0.289θ=cos-1(-0.289)θ=106.8°

Substitute 3.46h for L and 2h for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

2h=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=0.578θ=cos-1(0.578)θ=54.7°

Substitute 3.46h for L and -2h for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

2h=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=0.578θ=cos-1(0.578)θ=125.3°

Substitute 3.46h for L and 3h for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

3h=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=-0.867θ=cos-1(0.867)θ=30°

Substitute 3.46h for L and -3h for Lzinto equation (3), so the angle is,

-3h=3.46×h×cosθcosθ=-0.867θ=cos-1(-0.867)θ=150°

Hence, the possible angles that the angular momentum vector makes with the z-axis are θ=150°,125.3°,106.8°,90°,73.2°,54.7°,30°..

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the more circular orbits, =n-1and

P(r)r2ne-2r/na0

a) Show that the coefficient that normalizes this probability is

localid="1660047077408" (2na0)2n+11(2n)!

b) Show that the expectation value of the radius is given by

r¯=n(n+12)a0

and the uncertainty by

Δr=na0n2+14

c) What happens to the ratioΔr/r¯in the limit of large n? Is this large-n limit what would be expected classically?

Question: Explain to your friend. who has just learned about simple one-dimensional standing waves on a string fixed at its ends, why hydrogen's electron has only certain energies, and why, for some of those energies, the electron can still be in different states?

Show that a transition wherem1=±1corresponds to a dipole moment in the xy-plane, while m1=0 corresponds to a moment along the z-axis. (You need to consider only the ϕ -parts of therole="math" localid="1659783155213" ψi andψf , which are of the form eimlϕ):

If the constantCxinequation(7-5)were positive, the general mathematical solution would be

Ae+cxx+Be-cxx

Show that this function cannot be 0 at two points. This makes it an unacceptable solution for the infinite well, since it cannot be continuous with the wave functions outside the walls, which are 0.

When applying quantum mechanics, we often concentrate on states that qualify as “orthonormal”, The main point is this. If we evaluate a probability integral over all space of ϕ1*ϕ1or of ϕ2*ϕ2, we get 1 (unsurprisingly), but if we evaluate such an integral forϕ1*ϕ2orϕ2*ϕ1 we get 0. This happens to be true for all systems where we have tabulated or actually derived sets of wave functions (e.g., the particle in a box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom). By integrating overall space, show that expression (7-44) is not normalized unless a factor of 1/2is included with the probability.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free