Chapter 7: Q42E (page 281)
In Appendix G. the operator for the square of the angular momentum is shown to be
Use this to rewrite equation (7-19) as
Chapter 7: Q42E (page 281)
In Appendix G. the operator for the square of the angular momentum is shown to be
Use this to rewrite equation (7-19) as
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeClassically, what happens when a moving object has a head-on elastic collision with a stationary object of exactly equal mass? What if it strikes an object of smaller mass? Of larger mass? How do these ideas relate to Rutherford’s conclusion about the nature of the atom?
Classically, an orbiting charged particle radiates electromagnetic energy, and for an electron in atomic dimensions, it would lead to collapse in considerably less than the wink of an eye.
(a) By equating the centripetal and Coulomb forces, show that for a classical charge -e of mass m held in a circular orbit by its attraction to a fixed charge +e, the following relationship holds
.
(b) Electromagnetism tells us that a charge whose acceleration is a radiates power . Show that this can also be expressed in terms of the orbit radius as . Then calculate the energy lost per orbit in terms of r by multiplying the power by the period and using the formula from part (a) to eliminate .
(c) In such a classical orbit, the total mechanical energy is half the potential energy, or . Calculate the change in energy per change in r : . From this and the energy lost per obit from part (b), determine the change in per orbit and evaluate it for a typical orbit radius of . Would the electron's radius change much in a single orbit?
(d) Argue that dividing by P and multiplying by dr gives the time required to change r by dr . Then, sum these times for all radii from to a final radius of 0. Evaluate your result for . (One limitation of this estimate is that the electron would eventually be moving relativistically).
In general, we might say that the wavelengths allowed a bound particle are those of a typical standing wave, , where is the length of its home. Given that , we would have , and the kinetic energy, , would thus be . These are actually the correct infinite well energies, for the argumentis perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0 (inside the well) and is strictly constant. But it is a pretty good guide to how the energies should go in other cases. The length allowed the wave should be roughly the region classically allowed to the particle, which depends on the “height” of the total energy E relative to the potential energy (cf. Figure 4). The “wall” is the classical turning point, where there is nokinetic energy left: . Treating it as essentially a one-dimensional (radial) problem, apply these arguments to the hydrogen atom potential energy (10). Find the location of the classical turning point in terms of E , use twice this distance for (the electron can be on both on sides of the origin), and from this obtain an expression for the expected average kinetic energies in terms of E . For the average potential, use its value at half the distance from the origin to the turning point, again in terms of . Then write out the expected average total energy and solve for E . What do you obtain
for the quantized energies?
At heart, momentum conservation is related to the universe being "translationally invariant," meaning that it is the same if you shift your coordinates to the right or left. Angular momentum relates to rotational invariance. Use these ideas to explain at least some of the differences between the physical properties quantized in the cubic three-dimensional box versus the hydrogen atom.
A wave function with a non-infinite wavelength-however approximate it might be- has nonzero momentum and thus nonzero kinetic energy. Even a single "bump" has kinetic energy. In either case, we can say that the function has kinetic energy because it has curvature- a second derivative. Indeed, the kinetic energy operator in any coordinate system involves a second derivative. The only function without kinetic energy would be a straight line. As a special case, this includes a constant, which may be thought of as a function with an infinite wavelength. By looking at the curvature in the appropriate dimension(s). answer the following: For a givenn,isthe kinetic energy solely
(a) radial in the state of lowest l- that is, l=0; and
(b) rotational in the state of highest l-that is, l=n-1?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.