Explicitly verify that the simple function Rr=Aebrcan be made to satisfy radial equation (7-31), and in so doing, demonstrate what its angular momentum and energy must be.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The angular momentum is zero.

The energy is-me48πr0h2

Step by step solution

01

 Given data

Rr=Ae-br

Here, A and b constants.

02

 Concept

The property of any rotating body, which is described as the product of the moment of inertia and the angular velocity of rotation of the body, is known as angular momentum. It is analogous to the linear momentum for rotatory motion.

The radial equation is,

-h22m1r2ddrr2ddrRr+h2II+12mr2Rr-14πε0e2rRr=ERr......(1)(1)

Where,

m is the mass

e is the magnitude of the charge

I is the angular momentum

ε0is the permittivity of free space.

03

 To determine angular momentum and energy

Substitute Ae-brfor Rrin equation (1).

-h22m1r2r2ddrAe-br+h2I(I+1)2mr2Ae-br-14πε0e2rAebr=EAebr

Now, solve the localid="1659322395860" 1r2ddrr2ddrAe-brterm as follows:

localid="1659322573731" 1r2ddrr2ddrAe-br=1r2ddrr2-bAe-br=-br22r+-br2r2-bAe-br=-br2Ae-br2r+b2Ae-br=-bAe-br1r2-br

Substitute -bAe-br1r2-brfor 1r2ddrr2ddrAe-brin the equation (1).

-h22m-bAe-br1r2-br+h2I(I+1)2mr2Ae-br-e2rAebr=EAebr-h2-bAe-br2m2r-h2-bAe-br2m-b+h2I(I+1)2mr2Ae-br-14πε0e2rAe-br=EAebr-h2bAe-brmr-h2Ae-brb22m+h2I(I+1)2mr2Ae-br-14πε0e2rAe-br=EAe-br.............(2)

The last three terms in the above equation are proportional to the terms in the radial equation given by equation (1).

Comparing the coefficients of the terms in the above equation with equation (1), we get-

h2I(I+1)2mr2Ae-br=h2I(I+1)2mr2Ae-br

On solving we get,

I =0

Therefore, the angular momentum is zero.

The potential energy term in equation (2) is equal to -h2(Ae-br)b2mr

The potential energy term in equation (1) is equal to -14πε0e2r(Ae-br)

Thus equate the above two expressions and solve as follows:

h2Ae-brbmr=-14πε0e2rAe-brh2bm=e24πε0b=me24πε0h2

Now, equate the potential energy term to total energy, as the kinetic term is zero.

-2h2Ae-brbmr=EAebr-h2Ae-brbmr=EAebrE=-h2b22m

Substitute me24πε0h2 for b.

role="math" localid="1659324115735" E=h2rme24πε0h22=-me48πr0h2

Therefore, the angular momentum is zero and the energy is -me48πr0h2

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that a transition wherem1=±1corresponds to a dipole moment in the xy-plane, while m1=0 corresponds to a moment along the z-axis. (You need to consider only the ϕ -parts of therole="math" localid="1659783155213" ψi andψf , which are of the form eimlϕ):

A particular vibrating diatomic molecule may be treated as a simple harmonic oscillator. Show that a transition from that n=2state directly to n=0ground state cannot occur by electric dipole radiation.

Can the transition 2s1s in the hydrogen atom occur by electric dipole radiation? The lifetime of the 2 s is known to be unusual. Is it unusually short or long?

Question: The kinetic energy of hydrogen atom wave functions for which lis its minimum value of 0 is all radial. This is the case for the 1s and 2s states. The 2 p state has some rotational kinetic energy and some radial. Show that for very large n, the states of largest allowed lhave essentially no radial kinetic energy. Exercise 55 notes that the expectation value of the kinetic energy (including both rotational and radial) equals the magnitude of the total energy. Compare this magnitude with the rotational energy alone,L2/2mr2
,assuming that n is large. That lis as large as it can be, and thatrn2a0.

Taking then=3states as representative, explain the relationship between the complexity numbers of nodes and antinodes-of hydrogen's standing waves in the radial direction and their complexity in the angular direction at a given value of n. Is it a direct or inverse relationship, and why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free