Question: Section 7.5 argues that knowing all three components of would violate the uncertainty principle. Knowing its magnitude and one component does not. What about knowing its magnitude and two components? Would be left any freedom at all and if so, do you think it would be enough to satisfy the uncertainly principle?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

Only the magnitude of L and the Z-component of L can be found accurately.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of the Uncertainty principle

The Uncertainty principle states that the momentum and position of a particular particle cannot be measured with great accuracy. In general, it explains that uncertainty will be there in measuring a particular variable for a specific particle.

02

Determination of the violation of uncertainty principal and magnitude if two components are known 

Write the expression for the sum of the square of the components.

Lx2+Ly2+Lz2=L2

Here, L is the magnitude of angular momentum vector, LX is the x-component of angular momentum vector, LY is the y-component of angular momentum vector, and LZis the z-component of angular momentum vector.

It is known that LZ can be known with certainty, by the equation:LZ=ml , and is also quantized and can be calculated by the following equation.

L=l(l+1)

Here, is the Plank’s Constant, and is the azimuthal quantum number

So, does not commute withLX or LY . Hence, if relation isLx2+Ly2+Lz2=L2 being used to calculate the value of LX and , LY then it will be uncertain.

Thus, only the magnitude of L and the z-component of L can be found accurately.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Classically, an orbiting charged particle radiates electromagnetic energy, and for an electron in atomic dimensions, it would lead to collapse in considerably less than the wink of an eye.

(a) By equating the centripetal and Coulomb forces, show that for a classical charge -e of mass m held in a circular orbit by its attraction to a fixed charge +e, the following relationship holds

ω=er-3/24πε0m.

(b) Electromagnetism tells us that a charge whose acceleration is a radiates power P=e2a2/6ε0c3. Show that this can also be expressed in terms of the orbit radius as P=e696π2ε03m2c3r4. Then calculate the energy lost per orbit in terms of r by multiplying the power by the period T=2π/ωand using the formula from part (a) to eliminate .

(c) In such a classical orbit, the total mechanical energy is half the potential energy, or Eorbit=-e28πε0r. Calculate the change in energy per change in r : dEorbit/dr. From this and the energy lost per obit from part (b), determine the change in per orbit and evaluate it for a typical orbit radius of 10-10m. Would the electron's radius change much in a single orbit?

(d) Argue that dividing dEorbit/dr by P and multiplying by dr gives the time required to change r by dr . Then, sum these times for all radii from rinitial to a final radius of 0. Evaluate your result for rinitial=10-10m. (One limitation of this estimate is that the electron would eventually be moving relativistically).

In general, we might say that the wavelengths allowed a bound particle are those of a typical standing wave,λ=2L/n , where is the length of its home. Given that λ=h/p, we would have p=nh/2L, and the kinetic energy, p2/2m, would thus be n2h2/8mL2. These are actually the correct infinite well energies, for the argumentis perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0 (inside the well) and is strictly constant. But it is a pretty good guide to how the energies should go in other cases. The length allowed the wave should be roughly the region classically allowed to the particle, which depends on the “height” of the total energy E relative to the potential energy (cf. Figure 4). The “wall” is the classical turning point, where there is nokinetic energy left: E=U. Treating it as essentially a one-dimensional (radial) problem, apply these arguments to the hydrogen atom potential energy (10). Find the location of the classical turning point in terms of E , use twice this distance for (the electron can be on both on sides of the origin), and from this obtain an expression for the expected average kinetic energies in terms of E . For the average potential, use its value at half the distance from the origin to the turning point, again in terms of . Then write out the expected average total energy and solve for E . What do you obtain

for the quantized energies?

Consider a cubic 3D infinite well.

(a) How many different wave functions have the same energy as the one for which (nx,ny,nz)=(5,1,1)?

(b) Into how many different energy levels would this level split if the length of one side were increased by 5% ?

(c) Make a scale diagram, similar to Figure 3, illustrating the energy splitting of the previously degenerate wave functions.

(d) Is there any degeneracy left? If so, how might it be “destroyed”?

Calculate the electric dipole moment p and estimate the transition time for a hydrogen atom electron making an electric dipole transition from the

(n,l,m)=(3,2,0)to the (2,1,0) state.

Using the functions given in Table 7.4, verify that for the more circular electron orbit in hydrogen (i.e.,l=n-1), the radial probability is of the form

P(r)r2ne-2r/nao

Show that the most probable radius is given by

rmostprobable=n2ao

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free