In the twin paradox situation, a fellow student objects to the argument that Anna's acceleration is the root of the asymmetry. "All motion is relative! Anna is accelerating relativetoBob, but Bob is accelerating relative to Anna" Answer this objection.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer is below.

Step by step solution

01

A concept:

Relative acceleration (also or) is the acceleration of an object or observer B in the rest frame of another object or observer A.

02

Define the answer:

While the males who stayed behind did appear to have accelerated to the ladies who went out and returned to Earth, this was only a false impression because acceleration requires the application of force.

The man can claim that he wasn't accelerating because there was no net force exerted on him while the woman was away. The women must exert four different forces: an acceleration force to move away from Earth, a deceleration force near the end, an acceleration force to move back toward Earth, and a third force to move backwards towards Earth. In contrast to acceleration, motion is therefore not relative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider Anna, Bob and Carl in the twin paradox.

(a) According to Anna, when Planet X passes her, clocks on Planet X and Earth tick simultaneously. What is the time interval between these two events in the Earth-Planet X frame?

(b) According to Carl, when Planet X passes, clocks on Planet X and Earth tick simultaneously. What is the time interval between these two events in the Earth-Planet X frame?

(c) What does the clock on Planet X read when Carl and Anna reach it? Show how your results from part (a) and (b) agree with Figure 2.20.

You fire a light signal at 60°north of west (a) Find the velocity component of this, signal according to an observer moving eastward relative to you at half the speed of light. From them. determine the magnitude and direction of the light signal's velocity according to this other observer. (b) Find the component according to a different observer, moving westward relative to you at half the speed of light.

An object of mass 3mo moves to the right at 0.8c.

a) Calculate its momentum and energy.

b) Using the relativistic velocity transformation, determine its velocity in a new frame of reference moving it to right at 0.5c, then using it to determine the object's momentum and energy in this new frame.

c) Verify that equations role="math" localid="1657556434416" (2-38) are satisfied.

Particle 1, of mass role="math" localid="1657551290561" m1, moving at role="math" localid="1657551273841" 0.8crelative to the lab, collides head-on with particle 2, of mass m2, moving at 0.6crelative to the lab. Afterward, there is a single stationary object. Find in terms of role="math" localid="1657551379188" m1

(a) m2

(b) the mass of the final stationary object; and

(c) the change in kinetic energy in this collision.

From the Lorentz transformation equations, show that if time intervals between two events,t andt' , in two frames are of opposite sign, then the events are too far apart in either frame for light to travel from one to the other. Argue that therefore they cannot be casually related.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free