Question: The weight of the Empire State Building is . Show that the complete conversion of of mass would provide sufficient energy to putli.is rather a large object in a low Earth orbit or LEO for short. (Orbit radius Earth's radius).

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

LEO is the orbit very close to the earth’s surface, mostly under , but can be as low as . The conversion energy of 1kg mass is quite sufficient to get such a massive object that is The Empire State Building into Low Earth Orbit.

Step by step solution

01

A concept:

The conversion energy can be easily calculated using Einstein’s famous mass-energy relation, that is given by,

E=mc2 ….. (1)

Here, E is the rest mass energy, is the mass, and is the speed of light.

02

Calculate the conversion energy of mass of 1kg :

In this problem check if conversion energy of 1 kg of mass is sufficient to get the Empire State Building of 365 kilotons into a low earth orbit.

Consider the known data as below.

The mass, m = 1 kg

The speed of light, c=3×108m/s

Substitute these values into equation (1).

E=1kg×3×108m/s2=9×1016J

03

Determine the energy required to get the building to low earth orbit:

To get an object in LEO, the first object needs to be moved from the surface to an altitude of or more and it needs a minimum velocity to stay in orbit to avoid crashing. This minimum velocity required to stay in orbit is called orbital velocity, that is given by

Vo=gRE=GMERE

Here, g is the acceleration due to gravity.

For simplicity we will assume that the earth is not rotating that is the building is initially at rest. Now, we will apply the Work-Energy relation for the Earth-Building system,

W=ΔK+ΔU

W=12MBVo2+GMEMB1RE-1Ro ….. (2)

Here, Vo is the orbital velocity and Ro is the orbital radius.

Consider the known numerical data as beow.

The mass of the building,MB=3.65×106kg,

The mass of the earth, ME=5.97×1024kg

The radius of the the earth, RE=6.38×106m

Univeralsal constant, G=6.67×10-11Nm2Kg2

Substituting the expression of orbital velocity into expression (2) and solving further as follow.

W=12MBVo2+GMEMB1RE-1Ro=12MBGMERE2+GMEMB1RE-1RoW=12GMBMERE+GMBMERE-GMBMERo=GMBME32RE-1Ro

Here, the orbit radius is the same as the earth’s radius as given in the problem statement.

W=GMBME32RE-1RE=GMBME2RE

Substituting known numerical data in the above equation, and you have,

W=6.67×10-11Nm2kg23.65×108kg5.97×1024kg26.38×106m=1.453×1023Nm212.76×106m=1.14×1015J

Hence, the value of energy is1.14×1015Jwhich is far less compared to conversion energy of of mass.

Therefore, the conversion energy of 1kg mass is quite sufficient to get such a massive object that is The Empire State Building into Low Earth Orbit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the collision of two particles, each of mass mo. In experiment A, a particle moving at 0.9cstrikes a stationary particle.

  1. What is the total kinetic energy before the collision?
  2. In experiment B, both particles are moving at a speed u(relative to the lab), directly towards one another. If the total kinetic energy before the collision in experiment B is the same as that in experiment A, what is u?
  3. In both particles, the particles stick together. Find the mass of the resulting single particle in each experiment. In which is more of the initial kinetic energy converted to mass?

In the collision shown, energy is conserved because both objects have the same speed and mass after as before the collision. Since the collision merely reserves the velocities, the final (total) momentum is opposite the initial. Thus. momentum can be conserved only if it is zero.

(a) Using the relativistically correct expression for momentum. Show that the total momentum is zero-that momentum is conserved. (Masses are in arbitrary units).

(b) Using the relativistic velocity transformation. find the four velocities in a frame moving to the right at 0.6c.

(c) Verify that momentum is conserved in the new frame.

Question: A kaon (denoted ) is an unstable particle of mass 8.87×10-28kg. One of the means by which it decays is by spontaneous creation of two pions, and . The decay process may be represented as

K0π++π-

Both the π+ and π- have mass 2.49×10-28kg. Suppose that a kaon moving in the + x direction decays by this process, with the π+ moving off at speed 0.9C and the π- at 0.8c.

(a) What was the speed of the kaon before decay?

(b) In what directions do the pions move after the decay?

A projectile is a distance r from the center of a heavenly body and is heading directly away. Classically, if the sum of its kinetic and potential energies is positive, it will escape the gravitational pull of the body, but if negative, it cannot escape. Now imagine that the projectile is a pulse of light energy E. Since light has no internal energy ,E is also the kinetic energy of the light pulse. Suppose that the gravitational potential energy of the light pulse is given by Newton’s classical formula U=-(GMm/r), where M is the mass of the heavenly body and m is an “effective mass” of the light pulse. Assume that this effective mass is given by m=E/c2.

Show that the critical radius for which light could not escape the gravitational pull of a heavenly body is within a factor of 2 of the Schwarzschild radius given in the chapter. (This kind of “semiclassical” approach to general relativity is sometimes useful but always vague. To be reliable, predictions must be based from beginning to end on the logical, but unfortunately complex, fundamental equations of general relativity.)

Question: A rocket maintains a constant thrust F, giving it an acceleration of g

(i.e.,9.8m/s2).

(a) If classical physics were valid, how long would it take for the rocket’s speed to reach 0.99c??

(b) Using the result of exercise 117(c), how long would it really take to reach 0.99c??

u=11+(Ft/mc)2FTt

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free