The weight of the Empire State Building is 365kilotons. Show that the complete conversion of 1kgof mass would provide sufficient energy to putli.is rather large object in a low Earth orbit or LEO for short. (Orbit radius Earth's radius).

Short Answer

Expert verified

LEO is the orbit very close to the earth’s surface, mostly under 1000km, but can be as low as 160km. Here, in this problem we have to check if conversion energy of 1kg of mass is sufficient to get the Empire State Building of 365 kilotons into a low earth orbit.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the conversion energy of mass of1 kg

Here, the conversion energy can be easily calculated using Einstein’s famous mass-energy relation, that is E=mc2

=9×1016J

02

Determine the energy required to get the building to low earth orbit

To get an object in LEO, the first object needs to be moved from the surface to an altitude of 160kmor more and it needs a minimum velocity to stay in orbit to avoid crashing. This minimum velocity required to stay in orbit is called orbital velocity.

Velocity Vo=gRE=GMERE. For simplicity we will assume that the earth is not rotating that is the building is initially at rest. Now, we will apply Work-Energy relation for Earth-Building system,

W=ΔK+ΔU

=12MBVo2+GMEMB1RE-12Ro

Here, the orbit radius is the same as the earth’s radius as given in the problem statement. And by putting values of quantities in the above equation we get the value of energy1.14×1016J as which is far less compared to conversion energy of 1kgof mass. Therefore, the conversion energy of1kg mass is quite sufficient to get such a massive object that is The Empire State Building into Low Earth Orbit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If an object actually occupies less space physically when moving. It cannot depend on the direction we define as positive. As we know, an object aligned with the direction of relative motion is contracted whether it is fixed in frame S and viewed from S'. or the other way around. Use this idea to argue that distances along the y- and y'-axes cannot differ at all. Consider a post of length L0 fixed in frame S, jutting up from the origin along the +y-axis. with a saw at the top poised to slice off anything extending any higher in the passing frame S'. Also consider an identical post fixed in frame S'. What happens when the origins cross?

Equation (2-30) is an approximation correct only if the gravitational time-dilation effect is small. In this exercise, it is also assumed to be small. but we still allow for a nonuniform gravitational field. We start with (2-29), based on the Doppler effect in the accelerating frame. Consider two elevations, the lower at r1 and the upper at r1+dr. Equation (2·29) becomes

f(r1+dr)f(r1)=(1-gr1drc2)

Similarly, if we consider elevationsdata-custom-editor="chemistry" r1+dr and data-custom-editor="chemistry" r1+2dr, we have

f(r1+2dr)f(r1+dr)=(1-gr1+drdrc2)

We continue the process, incrementing r by dr, until we reach r2.

f(r2)f(r2-dr)=(1-gr2-drdrc2)

Now imagine multiplying the left sides of all the equations and setting the product equal to the product of all the right sides. (a) Argue that the left side of the product is simply f(r2)/f(r1). (b) Assuming that the termgdr/c2 in each individual equation is very small. so that productsof such termscan be ignored, argue that the right side of the product is

1-1c2g(r)dr

(c) Deduceg(r) from Newton’s universal law of gravitation, then argue that equation (2-31) follows from the result, just as (2-30) does from (2-29).

What is the momentum of a proton accelerated through 1gigavolts (GV)?

In Example 2.5, we noted that Anna could go wherever she wished in as little time as desired by going fast enough to length-contract the distance to an arbitrarily small value. This overlooks a physiological limitation. Accelerations greater than about 30gare fatal, and there are serious concerns about the effects of prolonged accelerations greater than 1g. Here we see how far a person could go under a constant acceleration of 1g, producing a comfortable artificial gravity.

(a) Though traveller Anna accelerates, Bob, being on near-inertial Earth, is a reliable observer and will see less time go by on Anna's clock (dt')than on his own (dt).Thus, dt'=(1/γ)dt, where u is Anna's instantaneous speed relative to Bob. Using the result of Exercise 117(c),with g replacing F/m, substitute for u,then integrate to show that

t=cgsinhgt'c

(b) How much time goes by for observers on Earth as they “see” Anna age 20 years?

(c) Using the result of Exercise 119, show that when Anna has aged a time t’, she is a distance from Earth (according to Earth observers) of

x=c2g(coshgt'c-1)

(d) If Anna accelerates away from Earth while aging 20 years and then slows to a stop while aging another 20. How far away from Earth will she end up and how much time will have passed on Earth?

Refer to Figure 2.18. (a) How long is a spaceship? (b) At what speed do the ships move relative to one another? (c) Show that Anna’s times are in accord with the Lorentz transformation equations. (d) Sketch a set of diagrams showing Anna’s complementary view of the passing of the ships. Include times in both frames.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free