Question: What if electrons were spin32 instead of spin 12. What would be Z for the first noble gas?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

The value of z = 4.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Assume electrons had spin s=32 there would be 2s+1=4 possible spin orientations along the given z-axis

02

Value of z.

It would have z=4.

The first noble gas would have 4 electrons in its 1s state, namely one for each of the possible spin orientations, to have a complete outer shell. It would therefore have z = 4 .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What angles might the intrinsic angular momentum vector make with the z-axis for a deuteron? (See Table 8.1)

Is intrinsic angular momentum "real" angular momentum? The famous Einstein-de Haas effect demonstrates it. Although it actually requires rather involved techniques and high precision, consider a simplified case. Suppose you have a cylinder 2cmin diameter hanging motionless from a thread connected at the very center of its circular top. A representative atom in the cylinder has atomic mass 60 and one electron free to respond to an external field. Initially, spin orientations are as likely to be up as down, but a strong magnetic field in the upward direction is suddenly applied, causing the magnetic moments of all free electrons to align with the field.

(a) Viewed from above, which way would the cylinder rotate?

(b) What would be the initial rotation rate?

To determine the value of Z at which the relativistic effects might affect energies and whether it applies to all orbiting electrons or to some more than others, also guess if it is acceptable to combine quantum mechanical results.

Question: A good electron thief needs a trap at low energy to entice its prey. A poor electron shepherd will have at least some of its flock dangling out at high energy, consider row 2 and 5 in the periodic table. Why should fluorine, in row 2, is less reactive than rubidium, in row 5?

The general form for symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions isψn(x2)ψn(x2)±ψn(x1)ψn(x2) but it is not normalized.

(a) In applying quantum mechanics, we usually deal with quantum states that are "orthonormal." That is, if we integrate over all space the square of any individual-particle function, such asψn(x2)ψn(x2)±ψn(x1)ψn(x2), we get 1, but for the product of different individual-particle functions, such asψnφ(x)ψn,(x), we get 0. This happens to be true for all the systems in which we have obtained or tabulated sets of wave functions (e.g., the particle in a box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom). Assuming that this holds, what multiplicative constant would normalize the symmetric and antisymmetric functions?

(b) What valueAgives the vectorV=A(x^±y^)unit length?

(c) Discuss the relationship between your answers in (a) and (b)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free