A dipole without angular momentum can simply rotate to align with the field (through it would oscillate unless it could shed energy). One with angular momentum cannot. Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

If it already has angular momentum along the xyplane, then the change in angular momentum will also be the xyplane.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation

Therefore, the field (along the z-axis) is perpendicular to the change in angular momentum. Assume the field lies along the x-axis and the dipole moment vector is on the xy- plane.

02

Change in angular momentum.

If the dipole without angular momentum aligns, the field along the z-axis will be perpendicular to the change in angular momentum. If it already has angular momentum along the xyplane, then a change in angular momentum will also be along the xyplane.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Zeeman effect occurs in sodium just as in hydrogen-sodium's lone 3svalence electron behaves much as hydrogen's 1.5. Suppose sodium atoms are immersed in a0.1Tmagnetic field.

(a) Into how many levels is the3P1/2level split?

(b) Determine the energy spacing between these states.

(c) Into how many lines is the3P1/2to3s1/2spectral line split by the field?

(d) Describe quantitatively the spacing of these lines.

(e) The sodium doublet (589.0nmand589.6nm)is two spectral lines.3P3/23s1/2and3P1/23s1/2. which are split according to the two differentpossible spin-orbit energies in the 3Pstate (see Exercise 60). Determine the splitting of the sodium doublet (the energy difference between the two photons). How does it compare with the line splitting of part (d), and why?

The radius of cesium is roughly0.26nm.

(a) From this estimate the effective charge its valence electron orbits

(b) Given the nature of the electron's orbit. is this effective nuclearcharge reasonable?

(c) Compare this effective Zwith that obtained for sodium in Example 8.3. Are the values at odds with the evidence given in Figure8.16that it takes less energy to remove an electron from cesium than from sodium? Explain.

(a) To determine the repulsive energy between the two electrons in helium.

(b) To determine the distance of electrons that would have to be separated.

(c) To compare distance with approximate orbit radius in Z=2hydrogen like atom.

Question: As indicated to remove one of the helium’s electrons requires24.6eV of energy when orbiting -24.6eV? Why or why not?

Question: In classical electromagnetism, the simplest magnetic dipole is a circular current loop, which behaves in a magnetic field just as an electric dipole does in an electric field. Both experience torques and thus have orientation energies -p.Eand-μ·B.(a) The designation "orientation energy" can be misleading. Of the four cases shown in Figure 8.4 in which would work have to be done to move the dipole horizontally without reorienting it? Briefly explain. (b) In the magnetic case, using B and u for the magnitudes of the field and the dipole moment, respectively, how much work would be required to move the dipole a distance dx to the left? (c) Having shown that a rate of change of the "orientation energy'' can give a force, now consider equation (8-4). Assuming that B and are general, write-μ·B.in component form. Then, noting thatis not a function of position, take the negative gradient. (d) Now referring to the specific magnetic field pictured in Figure 8.3 which term of your part (c) result can be discarded immediately? (e) Assuming thatandvary periodically at a high rate due to precession about the z-axis what else may be discarded as averaging to 0? (f) Finally, argue that what you have left reduces to equation (8-5).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free