Does circulating charge require both angular momentum and magnetic? Consider positive and negative charges simultaneously circulating and counter circulating.

Short Answer

Expert verified

No, the circulating charge does not require both angular momentum and magnetic.

Step by step solution

01

A concept:

Electrons flow from the negative pole to the positive pole. Conventional current or simply current behaves as if positive charge carriers cause current to flow. Conventional current flows from the positive terminal to the negative terminal.

02

Explanation:

Positive and negative charges are simultaneously circulating and counter-circulating.

If positive and negative charges move in circles in the same xy plane, the circulation of the positive and negative charges is opposite. Suppose both positive and negative charges have the same mass. In that case, their total angular momentum could be zero because the angular momentum of each would be in the opposite direction along the z -axis.

03

Conclusion:

No, the circulating charge does not require both angular momentum and magnetic moment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Figureshows the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. It reveals that spin-12particles have just two possible spin states. Assume that when these two beams are separated inside the channel (though still near its centreline). we can choose to block one or the other for study. Now a second such apparatus is added after the first. Their channels are aligned. But the second one is rotated about the-axis by an angle \(\phi\) from the first. Suppose we block the spin-down beam in the first apparatus, allowing only the spin-up beam into the second. There is no wave function for spin. but we can still talk of a probability amplitude, which we square to give a probability. After the first apparatus' spin-up beam passes through the second apparatus, the probability amplitude iscos(ϕ/2)2nd+sin(ϕ/2)2ndwhere the arrows indicate the two possible findings for spin in the second apparatus.

(a) What is the probability of finding the particle spin up in the second apparatus? Of finding it spin down? Argue that these probabilities make sense individually for representative values ofϕand their sum is also sensible.

(b) By contrasting this spin probability amplitude with a spatial probability amplitude. Such asψ(x)=Aete2. Argue that although the arbitrariness ofϕgives the spin cases an infinite number of solves. it is still justified to refer to it as a "two-state system," while the spatial case is an infinite-state system.

Slater Determinant: A convenient and compact way of expressing multi-particle states of anti-symmetric character for many fermions is the Slater determinant:

|ψn1x1m31ψn2x1m32ψn3x1m33···ψnNx1msNψn1x2m11ψn2x2m32ψn3x2m33···ψψn1x2msNψn3x3m31ψn2x3m12ψn3x3m33ψnNx3msN···············ψn1xNm11ψn2xNm32ψn3xNm33···ψnNxNmsN|

It is based on the fact that for N fermions there must be Ndifferent individual-particle states, or sets of quantum numbers. The ith state has spatial quantum numbers (which might be ni,i, and mfi) represented simply byni and spin quantum number msi. Were it occupied by the ith particle, the slate would beψni(xj)msi a column corresponds to a given state and a row to a given particle. For instance, the first column corresponds to individual particle state ψn(xj)ms1. Where jprogresses (through the rows) from particle 1 to particle N. The first row corresponds to particle I. which successively occupies all individual-particle states (progressing through the columns). (a) What property of determinants ensures that the multiparticle state is 0 if any two individual particle states are identical? (b) What property of determinants ensures that switching the labels on any two particles switches the sign of the multiparticle state?

As is done for helium in Table 8.3, determine for a carbon atom the various states allowed according to LS coupling. The coupling is between carbon's two 2p electrons (its filled 2s subshell not participating), one or which always remains in the 2p state. Consider cases in which the other is as high as the 3d level. (Note: Well both electrons are in the 2p, the exclusion principle restricts the number of states. The only allowed states are those in whichandlT are both even or both odd).

Question: As indicated to remove one of the helium’s electrons requires24.6eV of energy when orbiting -24.6eV? Why or why not?

Question: In the Stern-Gerlach experiment how much would a hydrogen atom emanating from a 500 K oven(KE=32kBT)be deflected in traveling 1 m through a magnetic field whose rate of change is 10 T/m?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free