Summarize the connection between angular momentum quantization and the stem-Gerlach experiment.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The quantized magnetic moment of the electron manifests as a splitting of the atomic beam.

Step by step solution

01

Summarize the experiment

The Stern-Gerlach experiment was to test the Bohr-Sommerfeld hypothesis that the direction of the angular momentum of the silver atom is quantized.

Electrons rotating in the hydrogen atom possess quantized angular momentum, which gives quantized magnetic moment. In the Stem-Gerlach experiment, silver atoms are sent through a non-uniform magnetic field.

02

Explanation

This impacts a force proportional to the magnetic moment. Here, a quantized magnetic moment of the electron manifests as a splitting of the atomic beam.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

Using a beam of electrons accelerated in an X-ray tube, we wish to knock an electron out of the shell of given element in a target. Section \(7.8\) gives the energies in a hydrogen like atom as . Z2(-13.6eV/n2)Assume that for fairly high Z , aK-shell electron can be treated as orbiting the nucleus alone.

(a) A typical accelerating potential in an X-ray tube is50kV . In roughly how high aZcould a hole in the K -shell be produced?

(b) Could a hole be produced in elements of higher Z?

In its ground state, nitrogen's 2p electrons interact to produce jT=32. Given Hund's rule, how might the orbit at angular momenta of these three electrons combine?

Question: In classical electromagnetism, the simplest magnetic dipole is a circular current loop, which behaves in a magnetic field just as an electric dipole does in an electric field. Both experience torques and thus have orientation energies -p.Eand-μ·B.(a) The designation "orientation energy" can be misleading. Of the four cases shown in Figure 8.4 in which would work have to be done to move the dipole horizontally without reorienting it? Briefly explain. (b) In the magnetic case, using B and u for the magnitudes of the field and the dipole moment, respectively, how much work would be required to move the dipole a distance dx to the left? (c) Having shown that a rate of change of the "orientation energy'' can give a force, now consider equation (8-4). Assuming that B and are general, write-μ·B.in component form. Then, noting thatis not a function of position, take the negative gradient. (d) Now referring to the specific magnetic field pictured in Figure 8.3 which term of your part (c) result can be discarded immediately? (e) Assuming thatandvary periodically at a high rate due to precession about the z-axis what else may be discarded as averaging to 0? (f) Finally, argue that what you have left reduces to equation (8-5).

Question: Concisely, why is the table periodic?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free