Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

Short Answer

Expert verified

E1/2=19h28mL2,   E1=5h28mL2,   E3/2=h2mL2

Step by step solution

01

Given information

StateEnergyn=1E1=12h28mL2n=2E2=22h28mL2n=3E3=32h28mL2

02

Concept of energy of particle in infinite square wall of length 

The energy of a particle in an infinite square well of length L is given by

En=n2h28mL2

03

Evaluate the energy of the particle in each state

Spin-1/2 Particles:

Since spin-1/2 particles are Fermions, the Pauli exclusion principle tells us that there can only be two particles in each state. So, in the minimum energy configuration, there will be two in the n=1state, two in the role="math" localid="1659957086918" n=2state, and one in the n=3state.

The energy of a particle in an infinite square well of lengthLis given by

En=n2h28mL2

Thus, the energies of the particles in each state are

StateEnergyn=1E1=12h28mL2n=2E2=22h28mL2n=3E3=32h28mL2

Therefore, the total energy for the system is

E=2E1+2E2+E3=19h28mL2

Spin-1 Particles:

Since spin-1 particles are Bosons, they do not obey the Pauli exclusion principle. Thus, every one of the particles may be in then=1 state. Therefore

E=5(1)2h28mL2=5h28mL2

Spin-3/2 Particles:

For spin-3/4 particles, there are four different possible value of ms:32,12,+12,+32.

Thus, without violation of the Pauli exclusion principle, four particles could have , with the fifth in the n=2.

Therefore, total energy will be E=4E1+E2=8h28mL2=h2mL2

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The radius of cesium is roughly0.26nm.

(a) From this estimate the effective charge its valence electron orbits

(b) Given the nature of the electron's orbit. is this effective nuclearcharge reasonable?

(c) Compare this effective Zwith that obtained for sodium in Example 8.3. Are the values at odds with the evidence given in Figure8.16that it takes less energy to remove an electron from cesium than from sodium? Explain.

Repeat example 8.6 but assume that the upper state is the 2p12rather than the2p32

A dipole without angular momentum can simply rotate to align with the field (through it would oscillate unless it could shed energy). One with angular momentum cannot. Why?

A hydrogen atom is subjected to a magnetic field Bstrong enough to completely overwhelm the spin-orbit coupling. Into how many levels would the 2p level split, and what would be the spacing between them?

Whether adding spins to get total spin, spin and orbit to get total angular momentum, or total angular momenta to get a "grand total" angular momentum, addition rules are always the same: Given J1=j1(j1+1)andJ2=j2(j2+1) . Where is an angular momentum (orbital. spin. or total) and a quantum number. the total isJT=jT(jT+1) , where jTmay take on any value between |j1-j2|and j1+j2in integral steps: and for each value ofJΓJTz=mπf . where mπmay take on any of2jr+I possible values in integral steps from-jT for +jTSince separately there would be 2j1+1possible values form11 and2j2+ I formρ2 . the total number of stales should be(2j1+1)(2j2+1) . Prove it: that is, show that the sum of the2jT+1 values formit over all the allowed values forj7 is (2j1+1)(2j2+1). (Note: Here we prove in general what we verified in Example 8.5for the specialcase j1=3,j2=12.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free