Exercise 45 refers to state I and II and put their algebraic sum in a simple form. (a) Determine algebraic difference of state I and state II.

(b) Determine whether after swapping spatial state and spin state separately, the algebraic difference of state I and state II is symmetric, antisymmetric or neither, and to check whether the algebraic difference becomes antisymmetric after swapping spatial and spin states both.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The resultant answer is.ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(-)

(b) The algebraic difference is symmetric in the spatial part and antisymmetric in the spin state; yes, the algebraic difference is antisymmetric under swapping the particles' total states-spatial plus spin.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The algebraic difference of states is given.

02

Concept of Determinant

The energy of electron innth-orbit:E=Z2-13.6eVn2

The energy KE which an object of charge q gains by passing through the potential differenceΔVis KE=qΔV.

03

Determine the function

(a)

Let's start by writing down our states I and II.

ψIx1,x2=ψnx1ψn'x2-ψn'x1ψnx2ψΠx1,x2=ψnx1ψn'x2-ψn'x1ψnx2

Taking the difference between these states gives us

04

Determine the function

(b)

Starting with the algebraic difference of part (a), we swap the spatial states-the n and n-alone and show that

ψI-II'x1,x2=ψn'x1ψnx2+ψnx1ψn'x2(-)ψI-II'x1,x2=ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(-)ψI-II'x1,x2=ψI-Πx1,x2

Thus, we find that the algebraic difference is symmetric with respect to swapping spatial states.

Similarly, starting from the algebraic difference again and swapping spin states/arrows alone this time, we have

ψI-II'x1,x2=ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(-)ψI-II'x1,x2=-ψnx1ψn'x2-ψn'x1ψnx2(-)ψI-II'x1,x2=-ψI-IIx1,x2

05

Simplify the function

We see thatψI-ΠI is anti symmetric with respect to swapping spin states alone.

ψI-II=ψn'x1ψnx2+ψnx1ψn'x2(-)ψI-II=-ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(-)ψI-II=-ψI-II

which shows that the algebraic difference is still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total states. This result should be expected for we know that the algebraic difference between two antisymmetric pieces-states I and II-results in an antisymmetric state. Note that the same results apply for the algebraic difference ψII - I..

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

Question: Bearing in mind its limiting cases of 1 and 2 mentioned in section 8.8, how would you describe the significance of the Lande g-factor

Using f2=L2+S2+2L-Sto eliminate L - S. as wellas L=l(l+1)h,S=s(s+1)andj(j+1)h, obtain equation (8- 32 )from the equation that precedes it.

Question: A good electron thief needs a trap at low energy to entice its prey. A poor electron shepherd will have at least some of its flock dangling out at high energy, consider row 2 and 5 in the periodic table. Why should fluorine, in row 2, is less reactive than rubidium, in row 5?

Consider row 4 of the periodic table. The trend is that the4xsubshell fills. Then the 3d, then the 4p.

(a) Judging by adherence to and deviation from this trend, whit might be said of the energy difference between the 4sand 3drelative to that between the 3dand 4p?

(b) Is this also true of row 5?

(c) Are these observations in qualitative agreement with Figure 8.13? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free