Consider Z=19potassium. As a rough approximation assume that each of itsn=1electron s orbits 19 pro. tons and half an electron-that is, on average, half its fellown=1electron. Assume that each of itsn=2electrons orbits 19 protons, two Is electrons. and half of the seven othern=2electrons. Continue the process, assuming that electrons at eachorbit a correspondingly reduced positive charge. (At each, an electron also orbits some of the electron clouds of higher. but we ignore this in our rough approximation.)

(a) Calculate in terms ofa0the orbit radii of hydrogenlike atoms of these effective Z,

(b) The radius of potassium is often quoted at around0.22nm. In view of this, are yourn=1throughn=3radii reasonable?

(c) About how many more protons would have to be "unscreened" to then=4electron to agree with the quoted radius of potassium? Considering the shape of its orbit, should potassium'sn=4electron orbit entirely outside all the lower-electrons?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)r1=0.054a0,r2=0.3a0,r3=1.64a0,r4=16a0

(b) The resultant answer is yes.

(c) The resultant answer is no.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

n=1,2,3,4For the electron in potassium.

02

Concept of Atomic radii

Expression for atomic radiirnis given by,rn=n2a0Z

Where,Zrepresents number of protons,represents principal quantum number anda0represents Bohr radius.

03

Determine the number of electrons

For the n=1 electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus and half of the other n=1 electron, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 18.5, since 19-0.5=18.5. That can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 1:

r1=(1)2a0(18.5)r1=0.054a0

For the n=2 electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1 s electrons, and half of the seven others n=2 electrons, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 13.5 (since 19-2 -3.5=18.5). that can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 2:

r2=(2)2a0(13.5)r2=0.296a0

For the n=3 electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1s electrons, all eight of the n=2 electrons, and half of the seven other electrons, the effective that the electron would see would be 5.5 (since 19-2-8-3.5=5.5 ). that can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 3:

r3=(3)2a0(5.5)r3=1.636a0

For the n=4 electron, if it orbits the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1s electrons, all eight of the n=2 electrons, and all eight of then=3 electrons, the effective that the electron would see would be 1 (since 19-2-8-8=1). That can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 4:

r4=(4)2a0Ir4=16a0

04

Determine the radii

(b)

Calculate the radii

r1=0.054a00.0529nma0r1=2.86×10-3nmr2=0.3a00.0529nma0r2=1.59×10-2nm

Similarly, calculate further:

r3=1.64a00.0529nma0r3=8.67×10-2nm

05

Determine the equation

(c)

The atomic orbit radius equation can be used to estimate the effective Z that the valence electron sees, using 0.22nmfor the rnfor the n and0.0529nm for thea0 , after solving for Z :

Z=n2a0rnZ=(4)2(0.0529nm)(0.22nm)Z=3.85

So since in the valence electron orbits an effective Z of 1 in the original model, and it would need to orbit an effective Z of 3.85 based just on the experimental radius, there would need to be 3.8 more protons be "unscreened". The valence electron of potassium is in the s-shell, and consequently will have a roughly elliptical orbit. Therefore, it will spend part of its time near the nucleus, inside the orbits of the lower n electrons

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In its ground state, carbon's 2pelectrons interact to produce jT=0. Given Hund's rule. what does this say about the total orbital angular momentum of these electrons?

The neutron comprises multiple charged quarks. Can a particle that is electrically neutral but really composed of charged constituents have a magnetic dipole moment? Explain your answer.

Exercise 44 gives an antisymmetric multiparticle state for two particles in a box with opposite spins. Another antisymmetric state with spins opposite and the same quantum numbers is ψn(x1)n2(x2)ψnn(x1)ψn(x2)

Refer to these states as 1 and 11. We have tended to characterize exchange symmetry as to whether the state's sign changes when we swap particle labels. but we could achieve the same result by instead swapping the particles' stares, specifically theandin equation (8-22). In this exercise. we look at swapping only parts of the state-spatial or spin.

(a) What is the exchange symmetric-symmetric (unchanged). antisymmetric (switching sign). or neither-of multiparticle states 1 and Itwith respect to swapping spatial states alone?

(b) Answer the same question. but with respect to swapping spin states/arrows alone.

(c) Show that the algebraic sum of states I and II may be written(ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2))(+)

Where the left arrow in any couple represents the spin of particle 1 and the right arrow that of particle?

(d) Answer the same questions as in parts (a) and (b), but for this algebraic sum.

(e) ls the sum of states I and 11 still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total-spatial plus spin-states?


(f) if the two particles repel each other, would any of the three multiparticle states-l. II. and the sum-be preferred?

Explain.

Angular momenta J1and J2interact so that they obey the strict quantum mechanical rules for angular momentum addition. If J1=1and J2=32what angles between J1and J2 allowed?

Two particles in a box have a total energy 5π22/2mL2.

(a) Which states are occupied?

(b) Make a sketch ofP5(x1,x2)versusx1for points along the linex2=x1.

(c) Make a similar sketch ofPA(x1,x2).

(d) Repeat parts (b) and (c) but for points on the linex2=Lx1

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free