Show that unless l=s, L and S cannot be exactly opposite: that is, show that at its minimum possible value. Forwhich j=l-s. The magnitude of the total angular momentum is strictly greater than the difference L-Sbetween the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The magnitude J of the total angular momentum is strictly greater than the differenceL-S between the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of the given data 

The given data can be listed below as:

  • The total angular momentum’s magnitude is J .
  • The orbital angular momentum is L .
  • The spin angular momentum is S.
  • The minimum value of the total angular momentum’s magnitude is j .
  • The minimum value of the orbital angular momentum is l.
  • The minimum value of the intrinsic angular momentum is s .
02

Significance of the angular momentum

The angular momentum is described as the quantity of the rotation of a particular system. The quantity of the rotation is described as the product of the angular velocity and the moment of inertia of a system.

03

Determination of the proof of the problem statement

The equation of the total angular momentum is expressed as:

J=jj+1

Here, J is the total angular momentum’s magnitude, j is the minimum value of the total angular momentum’s magnitude and is the Planck’s constant.

The equation of the orbital angular momentum is expressed as:

L=ll+1

Here, L is the orbital angular momentum, l is the minimum value of orbital angular momentum andis the Planck’s constant.

The equation of the spin angular momentum is expressed as:

S=ss+1

Here, is the spin angular momentum, is the minimum value of spin angular momentum and is the Planck’s constant.

The equation of the minimum value of the square of the total angular momentum is expressed as:

jm2=l-sl-s+12=ll+1+ss+1-2s-2sl2=ll+1+ss+1-2sl+12…(i)

The equation of the difference amongst the spin and orbital angular momentum is expressed as:

L-S=ll+1-ss+1L-S2=2ll+1+ss+1-2sll+1s+1…(ii)

Comparing the equation (i) and (ii), it can be identified that

sl+1<lsl+1s+1

Squaring the above equation, the equation can be expressed as:

sl+1<ls+1sl+s<sl+l

Hence, l>sas then .jm>L-S

Thus, magnitude J of the total angular momentum is strictly greater than the difference L-Sbetween the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The angles between S and μSand between L and μLare 180o. What is the angle between J and μJ in a2p32state of hydrogen?

The wave functions for the ground and first excited states of a simple harmonic oscillator are Aebx2/2andBxebx2/2. Suppose you have two particles occupying these two states.

(a) If distinguishable, an acceptable wave function would berole="math" localid="1659955524302" Aebx12/2Bx2ebx22/2. Calculate the probability that both particles would be on the positive side of the origin and divide by the total probability for both being found over all values ofx1,x2. (This kind of normalizing-as-we-go will streamline things.)

(b) Suppose now that the particles are indistinguishable. Using the±symbol to reduce your work. calculate the same probability ratio, but assuming that their multiparticle wave function is either symmetric or antisymmetric. Comment on your results.

Slater Determinant: A convenient and compact way of expressing multi-particle states of anti-symmetric character for many fermions is the Slater determinant:

|ψn1x1m31ψn2x1m32ψn3x1m33···ψnNx1msNψn1x2m11ψn2x2m32ψn3x2m33···ψψn1x2msNψn3x3m31ψn2x3m12ψn3x3m33ψnNx3msN···············ψn1xNm11ψn2xNm32ψn3xNm33···ψnNxNmsN|

It is based on the fact that for N fermions there must be Ndifferent individual-particle states, or sets of quantum numbers. The ith state has spatial quantum numbers (which might be ni,i, and mfi) represented simply byni and spin quantum number msi. Were it occupied by the ith particle, the slate would beψni(xj)msi a column corresponds to a given state and a row to a given particle. For instance, the first column corresponds to individual particle state ψn(xj)ms1. Where jprogresses (through the rows) from particle 1 to particle N. The first row corresponds to particle I. which successively occupies all individual-particle states (progressing through the columns). (a) What property of determinants ensures that the multiparticle state is 0 if any two individual particle states are identical? (b) What property of determinants ensures that switching the labels on any two particles switches the sign of the multiparticle state?

Repeat example 8.6 but assume that the upper state is the 2p12rather than the2p32

Question: The “radius of an atom” is a debatable quantity. Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free