Show that unless l=s, L and S cannot be exactly opposite: that is, show that at its minimum possible value. Forwhich j=l-s. The magnitude of the total angular momentum is strictly greater than the difference L-Sbetween the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The magnitude J of the total angular momentum is strictly greater than the differenceL-S between the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of the given data 

The given data can be listed below as:

  • The total angular momentum’s magnitude is J .
  • The orbital angular momentum is L .
  • The spin angular momentum is S.
  • The minimum value of the total angular momentum’s magnitude is j .
  • The minimum value of the orbital angular momentum is l.
  • The minimum value of the intrinsic angular momentum is s .
02

Significance of the angular momentum

The angular momentum is described as the quantity of the rotation of a particular system. The quantity of the rotation is described as the product of the angular velocity and the moment of inertia of a system.

03

Determination of the proof of the problem statement

The equation of the total angular momentum is expressed as:

J=jj+1

Here, J is the total angular momentum’s magnitude, j is the minimum value of the total angular momentum’s magnitude and is the Planck’s constant.

The equation of the orbital angular momentum is expressed as:

L=ll+1

Here, L is the orbital angular momentum, l is the minimum value of orbital angular momentum andis the Planck’s constant.

The equation of the spin angular momentum is expressed as:

S=ss+1

Here, is the spin angular momentum, is the minimum value of spin angular momentum and is the Planck’s constant.

The equation of the minimum value of the square of the total angular momentum is expressed as:

jm2=l-sl-s+12=ll+1+ss+1-2s-2sl2=ll+1+ss+1-2sl+12…(i)

The equation of the difference amongst the spin and orbital angular momentum is expressed as:

L-S=ll+1-ss+1L-S2=2ll+1+ss+1-2sll+1s+1…(ii)

Comparing the equation (i) and (ii), it can be identified that

sl+1<lsl+1s+1

Squaring the above equation, the equation can be expressed as:

sl+1<ls+1sl+s<sl+l

Hence, l>sas then .jm>L-S

Thus, magnitude J of the total angular momentum is strictly greater than the difference L-Sbetween the magnitudes of the orbital and intrinsic angular momentum vectors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To investigate the claim that lowerimplies lower f energy. consider a simple case: lithium. which has twon=1electrons and alonen=2valence electron.

(a)First find the approximate orbit radius, in terms ofa0. of ann=1electron orbiting three protons. (Refer to Section 7.8.)

(b) Assuming then=1electrons shield/cancel out two of the protons in lithium's nucleus, the orbit radius of ann=2electron orbiting a net charge of just+e.

(c) Argue that lithium's valence electron should certainly have lower energy in a 25 state than in a2pstale. (Refer Figure 7.15.)

The radius of cesium is roughly0.26nm.

(a) From this estimate the effective charge its valence electron orbits

(b) Given the nature of the electron's orbit. is this effective nuclearcharge reasonable?

(c) Compare this effective Zwith that obtained for sodium in Example 8.3. Are the values at odds with the evidence given in Figure8.16that it takes less energy to remove an electron from cesium than from sodium? Explain.

Question: Early on, the lanthanides were found to be quite uncooperative when attempts were made to chemically separate them from one another. One reason can be seen in Figure 8.16. Explain.

Consider Z=19potassium. As a rough approximation assume that each of itsn=1electron s orbits 19 pro. tons and half an electron-that is, on average, half its fellown=1electron. Assume that each of itsn=2electrons orbits 19 protons, two Is electrons. and half of the seven othern=2electrons. Continue the process, assuming that electrons at eachorbit a correspondingly reduced positive charge. (At each, an electron also orbits some of the electron clouds of higher. but we ignore this in our rough approximation.)

(a) Calculate in terms ofa0the orbit radii of hydrogenlike atoms of these effective Z,

(b) The radius of potassium is often quoted at around0.22nm. In view of this, are yourn=1throughn=3radii reasonable?

(c) About how many more protons would have to be "unscreened" to then=4electron to agree with the quoted radius of potassium? Considering the shape of its orbit, should potassium'sn=4electron orbit entirely outside all the lower-electrons?

Slater Determinant: A convenient and compact way of expressing multi-particle states of anti-symmetric character for many fermions is the Slater determinant:

|ψn1x1m31ψn2x1m32ψn3x1m33···ψnNx1msNψn1x2m11ψn2x2m32ψn3x2m33···ψψn1x2msNψn3x3m31ψn2x3m12ψn3x3m33ψnNx3msN···············ψn1xNm11ψn2xNm32ψn3xNm33···ψnNxNmsN|

It is based on the fact that for N fermions there must be Ndifferent individual-particle states, or sets of quantum numbers. The ith state has spatial quantum numbers (which might be ni,i, and mfi) represented simply byni and spin quantum number msi. Were it occupied by the ith particle, the slate would beψni(xj)msi a column corresponds to a given state and a row to a given particle. For instance, the first column corresponds to individual particle state ψn(xj)ms1. Where jprogresses (through the rows) from particle 1 to particle N. The first row corresponds to particle I. which successively occupies all individual-particle states (progressing through the columns). (a) What property of determinants ensures that the multiparticle state is 0 if any two individual particle states are identical? (b) What property of determinants ensures that switching the labels on any two particles switches the sign of the multiparticle state?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free