Imagine two indistinguishable particles that share an attraction. All other things being equal, would you expect their multiparticle spatial state to be symmetric, ant symmetric, or neither? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The particles are in close proximity and are represented by a symmetry function.

Step by step solution

01

A concept:

In order to determine the spatial state of the given particles, i.e. the asymmetry or the symmetry, acknowledge the kind of forces that the particles are sharing.

02

Determine the spatial state of the particle:

If the forces shared by the particles are attractive, the multi-spatial particle is said to be symmetric, so, the particles can be found near to each other.

03

Probability of the particle:

If the forces shared by the particles are repulsive then the probability of the particles being found closer to each other is negligible. The multi-spatial particle in this case is said to be asymmetric.

Hence, particles are in close proximity and are represented by a symmetry function.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To investigate the claim that lowerimplies lower f energy. consider a simple case: lithium. which has twon=1electrons and alonen=2valence electron.

(a)First find the approximate orbit radius, in terms ofa0. of ann=1electron orbiting three protons. (Refer to Section 7.8.)

(b) Assuming then=1electrons shield/cancel out two of the protons in lithium's nucleus, the orbit radius of ann=2electron orbiting a net charge of just+e.

(c) Argue that lithium's valence electron should certainly have lower energy in a 25 state than in a2pstale. (Refer Figure 7.15.)

The general rule for adding angular momenta is given in Exercise 66, when adding angular momenta withj1=2 and j2=32

(a) What are the possible values of the quantum numberjT and the total angular momentum jT.

(b) How many different states are possible and,

(c) What are the (jT,mjT)values for each of these states?

Question: In the Stern-Gerlach experiment how much would a hydrogen atom emanating from a 500 K oven(KE=32kBT)be deflected in traveling 1 m through a magnetic field whose rate of change is 10 T/m?

The wave functions for the ground and first excited states of a simple harmonic oscillator are Aebx2/2andBxebx2/2. Suppose you have two particles occupying these two states.

(a) If distinguishable, an acceptable wave function would berole="math" localid="1659955524302" Aebx12/2Bx2ebx22/2. Calculate the probability that both particles would be on the positive side of the origin and divide by the total probability for both being found over all values ofx1,x2. (This kind of normalizing-as-we-go will streamline things.)

(b) Suppose now that the particles are indistinguishable. Using the±symbol to reduce your work. calculate the same probability ratio, but assuming that their multiparticle wave function is either symmetric or antisymmetric. Comment on your results.

Verify that the normalization constant given in Example 8.2is correct for both symmetric and antisymmetric states and is independent ofnand n'?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free