Consider a gas of atoms that might serve as a laser medium but that is inequilibrium, With no population inversions. A photon gas coexists with the atoms. Woulda photon whose energy is precisely the differencebetween two atomic energy states be more likely to be absorbed or to induce a stimulated emission or neither? We expect that inequilibrium the number. of atomsat different levels and the number of photons of a given energy should be stable. Is your answer compactible?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The pricing should stay the same if nothing disturbs the system. As a result, no net change in the quantity of photons at distinct levels, or photons of a specific energy, can accumulate. The two of them will remain in a steady relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:

A photon whose energy is exactly equal to the difference between two atomic energy levels is more likely to be absorbed in a scenario where an atom gas coexists with a photon gas in equilibrium with no population inversions.The number of atoms in certain energy states and the number of photons with certain energies that are in equilibrium are both stable. In equilibrium where the number of atoms and photons are stable, the total absorption rateRabsis equal to the total emission rateRemission.since there are two types of possible emissions namely, spontaneous emission with rateRspon,, and stimulated emission with rateRstim,and the total emission rate must be:

Remission=Rstim+Rspon.

Then the absorption rateRabsis greater than the separate emission rates:

Rabs>Rstim,Rspon

Causing the photon to be more likely absorbed. Thus, our answer is compatible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nuclear density is approximately 1017 kg/m3. (a) Treating them as a gas of fermions bound together by the (no electrostatic) "strung attraction." calculate EFfor the neutrons in lead-206 (82 protons and 124 neutrons). (b) Treating them the same way. what would EFbe for the protons? (c) In fact, the energies of the most energetic neutrons and protons, those at the Fermi energy, are essentially equal in lead-206? What has been left out of pars (a) or (b) that might account for this?

To obtain equation (9-42), we calculated a total number of fermions Nas a function of EFassuming T=0. starting with equation(9.41) . But note that (9.4)is the denominator of our model for calculating average particle energy, equation (9.26). its numerator is the total (as opposed (o average particle) energy'. which we’ll callUtotalhere. In other wonts. the total system energy Uis the average particle energyE¯ times the total number of particles (n). CalculateUtotalas a function ofEF

And use this to show that the minimum (T=0)energy of a gas of spin fermions may be written asUtotal=310(3π23m3/2V)2/3N5/3

The entropy of an ideal monatomic gas is(3/2)NkBlnE+,NkBlnV-NkBlnN to within an additive constant. Show that this implies the correct relationship between internal energy Eand temperature.

What is special about a metastable Stale, and why is it so useful ina laser? Why wouldn't a non-metastable state at the same energy work?

When would a density of states be needed: in a sum over states? in a sum over energies? in an integral over energies? in an integral over states?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free