Consider a room divided by imaginary lines into three equal parts. Sketch a two-axis plot of the number of ways of arranging particles versus NleftandNrightfor the caseN=1023, Note that Nmiddleis not independent, being of courseNNnghtNleftYour axes should berole="math" localid="1658331658925" NleftandNright, and the number of ways should be represented by density of shading. (A form for numbers of ways applicable to a three-sided room is given in Appendix I. but the question can be answered without it.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The surface plot is

Step by step solution

01

Formula used

The number of ways of arranging particles in the room is given by:WNriju,NhatN=N!Nright!Nleft!(NNleftNright)!.

02

Given information from question

In this problem, we are to consider a room divided into three equal parts. The total number of particles in the room is given to beN=1023 .

03

Calculate the number of ways of arranging particles in the room

The room is now divided into three equal parts, then the number of ways of arranging particles in the room is given by:

WNriju,NhatN=N!Nright!Nleft!(NNleftNright)!. …… (1)

Since we are dealing with an enormous amount of particles ~1023, it will be more convenient to take the logarithm of eq. (I) and the desired surface plot in terms of the logarithm ofW versusNleft andNright- .

Taking the logarithm of eq. (I) we obtain:

lnW=lnN!Nright!Nleft!(NNleftNright)!=lnN!ln[Nright!Nleft!(NNleftNright)!=lnN!lnNright!lnNleft!ln(NNleftNright)!

Now, we make use of Stirling's approximation,

lnx!xlnxx

lnWNlnNNNrightlnNright+NrightNleftlnNleft+Nleft(NNleftNright)ln(NNleftNright)+(NNleftNright)nNlnNNrightlnNrightNleftlnNleft(NNleftNright)ln(NNleftNright)

04

Write a script using an appropriate software

We have a convenient form forW which takes into account large values of N, we write a script using an appropriate software to represent as a surface plot the dependence of lnWontoNleft andNright :

N=1e23;

[Nr,Nl]=meshgrid;(1:1e21:5e22)

W=N*log(N)Nr.*log(Nr)N1.*log(N1)(NN1Nr).*log(NN1Nr);

surf(Nr,N1,W)

caxis([5e22 1.1e23])

colorbar;

xlabel('N_{right \}'); ylabel('N_\{left \}');

05

The surface plot for lnW 

The surface plot is

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

There are more permutations of particle labels when two particles have energy0 and two have energy1 than when three particles have energy 0and one has energy . 2(The total energiesarethe same.) From this observation alone argue that the Boltzmann distribution should be lower than the Bose-Einstein at the lower energy level.

The entropy of an ideal monatomic gas is(3/2)NkBlnE+,NkBlnV-NkBlnN to within an additive constant. Show that this implies the correct relationship between internal energy Eand temperature.

Given an arbitrary thermodynamic system, which is larger. the number of possible macro-states. or the numberof possible microstates, or is it impossible to say? Explain your answer. (For most systems, both are infinite, but il is still possible to answer the question,)

For a particle in a one-dimensional (ID) box, Enis proportional to a single quantum number n. Let us simplify things by ignoring the proportionality factor: En=n2 . For a 3D box, Enx,ny,nz=nx2+ny2+nz2, and the 2D box is fairly obvious.

(a) The table shows a start on accounting for allowed states. Complete the table, stopping after the 10th state (state, not energy) for all three cases.

(b) Find the number of states per energy difference for the first five states and the last five states for all three cases. For instance, for the first five in the ID case, it is 5 states per energy difference of 24, or5/24 .

(c) Overlooking the obviously crude aspects of this accounting, does the "density of states" seem to increase with energy, decrease with energy, or stay about the same?

Example 9.4 investigated one criterion for quantum indistinguishability with reference to atmospheric nitrogen. Here we investigate the other, (a) Calculate the avenge separation between nitrogen molecules in the air. Assume a temperature of 300K a pressure of1atmand air that is 80% nitrogen. (b) Calculate the wave length of a typical nitrogen molecule in the air. (c) How does your result relate to Example 9.4?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free