Chapter 9: Q30E (page 404)
Obtain equation (9- 15) from (9-14). Make use or the following sums, correct when :
Short Answer
Equation simplifies to equation
Chapter 9: Q30E (page 404)
Obtain equation (9- 15) from (9-14). Make use or the following sums, correct when :
Equation simplifies to equation
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeThe electromagnetic intensity thermally radiated by a body of temperature is given by where
This is known as the Stefan-Boltzmann law. Show that this law follows from equation (9-46). (Note: Intensity, or power per unit area, is the product of the energy per unit volume and distance per unit time. But because intensity is a flow in a given direction away from the blackbody, the correct speed is not . For radiation moving uniformly in all directions, the average component of velocity in a given direction is .)
To obtain the Maxwell speed distribution, we assumed a uniform temperature. kinetic-only energy of , and we assumed that we wished to find the average of an arbitrary function of X. Along the way, we obtained probability per unit height speed,.
a) Assuming a uniform temperature and an energy ofand assuming we wish to find the average of an arbitrary function of Y, obtain a probability per unit height, .
b) Assuming a temperature of. how much less the density of the atmosphere'sat an altitude of(aboutft) than at sea level'?
(c) What of thein the atmosphere?
We based the exact probabilities of equation (9-9) on the claim that the number of ways of addingN distinct nonnegative integer quantum numbers to give a total ofM is. Verify this claim (a) for the caseandfor the case.
The Stirling approximation., is very handy when dealing with numbers larger than about . Consider the following ratio: the number of ways Nparticles can be evenly divided between two halves of a room to the number of ways they can be divided withon the right andon the left.
(a) Show, using the Stirling approximation, that the ratio is approximatelyfor large.
(b) Explain how this fits with the claim that average behaviours become more predictable in large systems.
For a particle in a one-dimensional (ID) box, is proportional to a single quantum number . Let us simplify things by ignoring the proportionality factor: . For a 3D box, , and the 2D box is fairly obvious.
(a) The table shows a start on accounting for allowed states. Complete the table, stopping after the 10th state (state, not energy) for all three cases.
(b) Find the number of states per energy difference for the first five states and the last five states for all three cases. For instance, for the first five in the ID case, it is 5 states per energy difference of 24, or .
(c) Overlooking the obviously crude aspects of this accounting, does the "density of states" seem to increase with energy, decrease with energy, or stay about the same?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.