Chapter 9: Q39E (page 405)
Show that in the limit. Equation (9.15) becomes (9.28).
Short Answer
The given expression is verified.
Chapter 9: Q39E (page 405)
Show that in the limit. Equation (9.15) becomes (9.28).
The given expression is verified.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeConsider a room divided by imaginary lines into three equal parts. Sketch a two-axis plot of the number of ways of arranging particles versus andfor the case, Note that is not independent, being of courseYour axes should berole="math" localid="1658331658925" and, and the number of ways should be represented by density of shading. (A form for numbers of ways applicable to a three-sided room is given in Appendix I. but the question can be answered without it.)
There are more permutations of particle labels when two particles have energy and two have energy than when three particles have energy and one has energy . (The total energiesarethe same.) From this observation alone argue that the Boltzmann distribution should be lower than the Bose-Einstein at the lower energy level.
By carrying out the integration suggested just before equation (9-28), show that the average energy of a one-dimensional oscillator in the limit is.
For a particle in a one-dimensional (ID) box, is proportional to a single quantum number . Let us simplify things by ignoring the proportionality factor: . For a 3D box, , and the 2D box is fairly obvious.
(a) The table shows a start on accounting for allowed states. Complete the table, stopping after the 10th state (state, not energy) for all three cases.
(b) Find the number of states per energy difference for the first five states and the last five states for all three cases. For instance, for the first five in the ID case, it is 5 states per energy difference of 24, or .
(c) Overlooking the obviously crude aspects of this accounting, does the "density of states" seem to increase with energy, decrease with energy, or stay about the same?
Suppose we have a system of identical particles moving in just one dimension and for which the energy quantization relationship is, whereis a constant andan integer quantum number. Discuss whether the density of states should be independent of, an increasing function of, or a decreasing function of.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.