Exercise 52 gives the Boltzmann distribution for the special case of simple harmonic oscillators, expressed in terms of the constantε, Nω0/(2s+1)and Exercise 53 gives the two quantum distributions in that case. Show that both quantum distributions converge to the Boltzmann in the limitkBT.

Short Answer

Expert verified

the Bose Einstein distribution approaches NBE(E)EkBT1eEkBTand matches the Boltzmann distribution of equation (4), thus showing their correlation at high temperature.

The Fermi-Dirac distribution approaches to NFB(E)EkBT1eEkBTand matches the Boltzmann distribution of equation (4) thus showing their correlation at high temperature.

Step by step solution

01

Formula used:

The quantum distributions for some energy Eare the Bose-Einstein distribution NBE(E)and the Fermi-Dirac distributionNFD(E)

NBE(E)=1eEkBT1eEkBT1 ……. (1)

NFD(E)=1eEkBTeEkBT1+1 ……. (2)

Here,EEnergy

kBBoltzmann's constant

TTemperature

E=Nω02s+1 ……. (3)

Here,

NNumber of oscillators

Planck's reduced constant

ω0Fundamental angular frequency

sSpin

02

Calculate the Boltzmann distribution

The Boltzmann distributionNBoltz(E)is given by

NBoltz(E)=EkBT1eEkBT ……. (4)

An approximation forezwhen zis very small will be helpful:

ez1+z ……. (5)

NBE(E)=1eEkBT1eEkBT1

If kBT>>Ethen theE/kBTin the exponent of the denominator will be very small, meaning that the approximation of equation (5) can be used withzbeing .E/kBT

NBE(E)1eEkBT1(1EkBT11eEkBT11+EkBT11kBTEeEkBT1

\\

Further solving,

NBE(E)1kBTEeEkBT11kBTEeEkBTEkBT1eEkBT

So, the Bose Einstein distribution approaches NBE(E)EkBT1eEkBTand matches the Boltzmann distribution of equation (4), thus showing their correlation at high temperature.

03

The Fermi-Dirac distribution

To show that the Fermi-Dirac distribution of equation (2).

NFD(E)=1eEkBTeEkBT1+1

It approaches the Boltzmann distribution whenkBT>>E, the approximation of equation (5) is used, with zbeing E/kBT(since that ratio is very small for the given condition).

NFD(E)1eEkBT(1+EkBT)1+11(eEkBTEkBT)+11kBTEeEkBT+1

SincekBTis much greater thanEthen kBT/Ewill be very large, making(kBT/E)eE/kBTvery large as well. Given that, adding 1 to it won't significantly affect it; so, it can be ignored.

NFD(E)1kBTEeEkBT+11kBTEeEkBTEkBT1eEkBT

So, the Fermi-Dirac distribution approaches to NFB(E)EkBT1eEkBTand matches the Boltzmann distribution of equation (4) thus showing their correlation at high temperature

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Defend or refuel the following claim: An energy distribution, such as the Boltzmann distribution. specifies the microstate of a thermodynamic system.

From elementary electrostatics the total electrostatic potential energy in a sphere of uniform charge Q and radius R is given by

U=3Q25×4π0R

(a) What would be the energy per charge in a lead nucleus if it could be treated as 82 protons distributed uniformly throughout a sphere of radiusrole="math" localid="1659180305412" 7×10-15m

(b) How does this result fit with Exercise 87?

Derivation of equation(940): Our model for calculatingE¯is equation (9-26), whose denominator is the total number of particlesNand whose numerator is the total energy of the system, which we here callUtotal. State with the denominator:

N=0N(E)(E)dE

Insert the quantum gas density of states and an expression for the distribution. using±to distinguish the Bose-Einstein from the Fermi-Dirac. Then change variables:E=y2, and factorBe+r2/kUTout of the denominator. In the integrand will be a factor

(11Bey2/kBT)1

Using,(lε)11±ε a sum of two integrals results, each of Gaussian form. The integral thus becomes two terms in powers of1/B. Repeat the process. but instead find an expression forUtotalin terms of1/B, using

U|ntal=0EN(E)D(E)dE

Divide your expression forUtotalby that forN. both in terms of1/B. Now1/Bcan safely be eliminated by using the lowest-order expression forNin terms of1/B.

Suppose that in Figure 9.27, the level labelled E1, rather than the one labelledE2, were metastable. Might the material still function as a laser? Explain.

Show that in the limithω0kBT. Equation (9.15) becomes (9.28).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free