Exercise 54 calculates the three oscillator distributions'E=0values in the special case wherekBTis15ξ. Using a very common approximation technique. show that in the more general low-temperature limit,kBTε,theoccupation numbers becomeδ/kBT,e5/kBT, and 1, for the distinguishable. boson. and fermion cases, respectively. Comment on these results. (Note: Although we assume thatkBTNω0/(2s+1). we also still assume that levels are closely spaced-that is kBhω0.),

Short Answer

Expert verified

For the three distributions, the results are as expected in terms of their relationship to the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Because fermions resist being clumped together in the same state (because Pauli stated that no two fermions can share the same state), a very low temperature is required to view an entire oscillator in the ground state. The bosons, on the other hand, have no such constraints and can pack a large number of oscillators into the ground state. And, ignoring spin, the Boltzmann conclusion is simply another way of saying that the average number of oscillators is equal to the total energy of the oscillators divided by the energy of each oscillator

Step by step solution

01

Formula used

The equations for the distributions will be needed;

NBoltz(E)=EkBT1eE/kBT ……. (1)

NBE(E)=1eE/kBT1eE/kBT1 ……. (2)

NFD(E)=1eEkBTeEkBT1+1 ……. (3)

Here,

EEnergy

kBBoltzmann's constant

TTemperature

E=Nω02s+1 ……. (4)

Here,

NNumber of oscillators

Planck's reduced constant

ω0Fundamental angular frequency

sSpin

02

Check the Boltzmann distribution of equation (2)

The Boltzmann distribution of equation (2) is checked first, using that Ewill be 0:

NBoltz(E)=EkBT1eEkBTNBoltz(0)=EkBT1e(0/VBT=EkBT1e0=EkBT

So, the number of oscillators expected in the ground state if they were classically distinguishable would be .

NBoltz(0)=EkBT

03

Check the Bose-Einstein distribution of equation (3)

The Bose-Einstein distribution of equation (3) is checked with

being 0.

NBE(E)=1eEkBT1eEkBT1

At E=0,

NBE(0)=1e[0/KBT1eEkBT1=1e01eE/KBT1=1e01eE///BT1=111eE/kBT1

NBE(0)=111eEkBT1eEkBT1eEkBT=11(1eEkBT)1eEkBT=1eEkBTeEkBT

NBE(0)=1eEkBTeEkBT=1eEkBTeEkBTeEkBT=eEkBT1

Since kBTis very small, thatξ/kBTmeans that will be very large, and consequently, soeE/kBT. Thus subtracting 1 from it won't significantly affect it, and can be ignored:

NBE(0)=eE/kBT1NBE(0)eE/kBT

So, the number of oscillators expected in the ground state if they were bosons would beNBE(0)eE/kBT and matches the expected value for the Bose-Einstein distribution, thus verifying it.

04

Check for the Fermi-Dirac distribution of equation (4)

The Fermi-Dirac distribution of equation (4) is checked for an Eof 0.

NFD(E)=1EEkBTeEkBT1+1NFD(0)=1e(0)/kBTeE/kBT+1=1c0eE/kBT+1=11eE/kBT+1=11eEkBT+1

NFD(0)=11eEkBT+eEkBTeEkBT=1[1+eEkBTeEkBT]=eEkBT1+eEkBT

Since kBTis very small, that means that ξ/kBTwill be very large, and consequently, so will eE/kBT. Thus adding 1 to it won't significantly affect it, and can be ignored

NFD(0)=eEkBT1+eEkBTeEkBTeEkBT1

So, the number of oscillators expected in the ground state if they were fermions would beNFD(0)1 and matches the expected value from equation (1) for the Fermi-Dirac distribution thus verifying it.

05

Conclusion

For the three distributions, the results are as expected in terms of their relationship to the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Because fermions resist being clumped together in the same state (because Pauli stated that no two fermions can share the same state), a very low temperature is required to view an entire oscillator in the ground state. The bosons, on the other hand, have no such constraints and can pack a large number of oscillators into the ground state. And, ignoring spin, the Boltzmann conclusion is simply another way of saying that the average number of oscillators is equal to the total energy of the oscillators divided by the energy of each oscillator.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Obtain an order-of-magnitude value for the temperature at which helium might begin to exhibit quantum/ superfluid behaviour. See equation (9.43). (Helium's specific gravity is about 0.12.)

What is special about a metastable Stale, and why is it so useful ina laser? Why wouldn't a non-metastable state at the same energy work?

The fact that a laser's resonant cavity so effectively sharpens the wavelength can lead to the output of several closely spaced laser wavelengths, called longitudinal modes. Here we see how. Suppose the spontaneous emission serving as the seed for stimulated emission is of wavelength , but somewhat fuzzy, with a line width of roughly0.001nm either side of the central value. The resonant cavity is exactly60cm long. (a) How many wavelengths fit the standing-wave condition'? (b) If only u single wavelength were desired, would change the length of the cavity help? Explain.

Equation (9-27) gives the density of states for a system of oscillators but ignores spin. The result, simply one state per energy change ofbetween levels, is incorrect if particles are allowed different spin states at each level, but modification to include spin is easy. From Chapter 8, we know that a particle of spinis allowedspin orientations, so the number of states at each level is simply multiplied by this factor. Thus,

D(E)=(2s+1)/hω0.

(a) Using this density of states, the definitionNhω0/(2s+1)=ε1, and

N=0N(E)D(E)dE

calculate the parameterin the Boltzmann distribution (9-31) and show that the distribution can thus be rewritten as

N(E)Boltz=εkBT1eE/kBT

(b) Argue that ifkBT>>ε,the occupation number is much less than 1 for all E.

Using density of states D(E)=(2s+1)0, which generalizes equation (9-27) to account for multiple allowed spin states (see Exercise 52), the definition Nhω0/(2s+1)=εand N=0N(E)D(E)dE. Solve for Bin distributions (9-32) and (9-33) careful use of ±will cut your work by about half. Then plug back in and show that for a system of simple harmonic oscillators, the distributions become γ(E)BE=1eE/kBT1eδ/kBT1andN(E)FD=1eE/kBTe+δ/kBT1+1.

You will need the following integral:0(Be2±1)1dz=±ln(1±1B).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free