Copper has one conduction electron per atom and a density of8.9×103kg/m3. By the criteria of equation(943), show that at room temperature(300K), the conduction electron gas must be treated as a quantum gas of indistinguishable particles.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The conduction electrons don't satisfy the condition to be considered a classical gas.

Step by step solution

01

Formula used

We will use the condition for classical behaviour to see thatin copper the conduction electron constitutes a quantum gas-

NV3(mkBT)32<<1

Here,

NNumber of particles

VVolume

Planck's reduced constant

mMass of the object

kBBoltzmann' constant

TTemperature.

Converting mass of copper from u to unit

mA=63.546u=(63.546u)(1.66×1027kg1u)=1.055×1025kg

02

The condition for classical behaviour to see that in copper the conduction electron constitutes a quantum gas

NV3(mkBT)32<<1DmA3(mkBT)32<<1

Substitute1.38×1023J/K for kB,8.9×103kg/m3for density of copper(D)1.055×1031J.s for ,1.055×1025kgfor mAand 300Kfor T,

DmAh3(mkBT)32=(8.9×103kg/m3)(1.055×1025kg)(1.055×1031J.s)3[(9.1×1025kg)(1.38×1023J/K)(300K)]32=428.4

Since 428.4 is not less than less than 1, so the statement isn't true. It means that the conduction electrons don't satisfy the conditions to be conditions a classical gas. Therefore, since they aren't considered to be a classical gas, they're considered a quantum gas.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When a star has nearly bumped up its intimal fuel, it may become a white dwarf. It is crushed under its own enormous gravitational forces to the point at which the exclusion principle for the electrons becomes a factor. A smaller size would decrease the gravitational potential energy, but assuming the electrons to be packed into the lowest energy states consistent with the exclusion principle, "squeezing" the potential well necessarily increases the energies of all the electrons (by shortening their wavelengths). If gravitation and the electron exclusion principle are the only factors, there is minimum total energy and corresponding equilibrium radius.

(a) Treat the electrons in a white dwarf as a quantum gas. The minimum energy allowed by the exclusion principle (see Exercise 67) is
Uclocimns=310(3π2h3me32V)23N53

Note that as the volume Vis decreased, the energy does increase. For a neutral star. the number of electrons, N, equals the number of protons. If protons account for half of the white dwarf's mass M (neutrons accounting for the other half). Show that the minimum electron energy may be written

Uelectrons=9h280me(3π2M5mp5)131R2

Where, R is the star's radius?

(b) The gravitational potential energy of a sphere of mass Mand radius Ris given by

Ugray=-35GM2R

Taking both factors into account, show that the minimum total energy occurs when

R=3h28G(3π2me3mp5M)13

(c) Evaluate this radius for a star whose mass is equal to that of our Sun 2x1030kg.

(d) White dwarfs are comparable to the size of Earth. Does the value in part (c) agree?

Suppose we have a system of identical particles moving in just one dimension and for which the energy quantization relationship isE=bn2/3, wherebis a constant andan integer quantum number. Discuss whether the density of states should be independent ofE, an increasing function ofE, or a decreasing function ofE.

There are more permutations of particle labels when two particles have energy0 and two have energy1 than when three particles have energy 0and one has energy . 2(The total energiesarethe same.) From this observation alone argue that the Boltzmann distribution should be lower than the Bose-Einstein at the lower energy level.

Figure 9.8 cannot do justice to values at the very highspeed end of the plot. This exercise investigates how small it really gets. However, although integrating the Maxwell speed distribution over the full range of speeds from 0 to infinity can be carried out (the so-called Gaussian integrals of Appendix K), over any restricted range, it is one of those integrals that. unfortunately. cannot be done in closed form. Using a computational aid of your choice. show that the fraction of molecules moving faster thanis; faster than6vrmsis-10-23; and faster than10vmsis~10-64. wherevrms" from Exercise 41, is3kBT/m. (Exercise 48 uses these values in an interesting application.)

Consider a simple thermodynamic system in which particles can occupy only two states: a lower state, whose energy we define as 0 , and an upper state, energyEu

(a) Cany out the sum (with only two states, integration is certainly not valid) giving the average particle energy E. and plot your result as a function of temperature.

(b) Explain qualitatively why it should behave as it does,

(c) This system can be used as a model of paramagnetic, where individual atoms' magnetic moments can either be aligned or anti aligned with an external magnetic field, giving a low or high energy, respectively. Describe how the average alignment or antialignment depends on temperature. Does it make sense'?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free