The maximum wavelength light that will eject electrons from metal I via the photoelectric effect is410nm. For metal2, it is280nm. What would be the potential difference if these two metals were put in contact?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The contact potential between the two metals will beV1V2=1.4V

Step by step solution

01

The contact potential between two metal and kinetic energy of photons.

The contact potential between two metal is given by-

V1V2=ϕ2ϕ1e …... (1)

Where;

ϕ1,ϕ2Work functions of metal 1 and 2

V1,V2Potential of metal 1 and 2

eElementary unit charge

Also, kineticenergy of photons ejected while being struck by photons is-

KE=hcλϕ …... (2)

Where;

hPlanck's constant

cSpeed of light in vacuum

ϕWork function of material

λWavelength of photon

Convert given wavelength of metals into standard units

(410nm)(1×109m1nm)=4.1×107mn(280nm)(1×109m1nm)=2.8×107m

02

Find the work functions of the metals

λTo find the work functions of the metals, equation (2) is used, with the condition that the kinetic energy of the ejected electrons will be 0 for the maximum possible wavelength usedλmaxthen solved for φ:

KE=hcλφ0=hcλmaxφφ=hcλmax

Substitute 6.63×1034J.s forh,3×108m/s forc, and 4.1×107mfor ,

φ1=cmax=(6.63×1034J.s)(3×108m/s)(4.1×107m)=4.85×1019J

Substitute 6.63×1034J.s forh,3×108m/s forc, and 2.8×107mforλ ,

φ1=cmax=(6.63×1034J.s)(3×108m/s)(2.8×107m)=7.1×1019J

03

Find the contact potential between two metals. 

Then substitute those into equation (1), along with 1.6×1019Cfor e:

V1V2=φ2φ1e=(7.1×1019J)(4.85×1019J)(1.6×1019C)=1.41V

Thus, the contact potential between the two metals will beV1V2=1.4V

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To obtain equation (9-42), we calculated a total number of fermions Nas a function of EFassuming T=0. starting with equation(9.41) . But note that (9.4)is the denominator of our model for calculating average particle energy, equation (9.26). its numerator is the total (as opposed (o average particle) energy'. which we’ll callUtotalhere. In other wonts. the total system energy Uis the average particle energyE¯ times the total number of particles (n). CalculateUtotalas a function ofEF

And use this to show that the minimum (T=0)energy of a gas of spin fermions may be written asUtotal=310(3π23m3/2V)2/3N5/3

Discusses the energy balance in a white dwarf. The tendency to contract due to gravitational attraction is balanced by a kind of incompressibility of the electrons due to the exclusion principle.

(a) Matter contains protons and neutrons, which are also fanions. Why do the electrons become a hindrance to compression before the protons and neutrons do?

(b) Stars several times our Sun's mass has sufficient gravitational potential energy to collapse further than a white dwarf; they can force essentially all their matter to become neutrons (formed when electrons and protons combine). When they cool off, an energy balance is reached like that in the white dwarf but with the neutrons filling the role of the incompressible fermions. The result is a neutron star. Repeat the process of Exercise 89. but assume a body consisting solely of neutrons. Show that the equilibrium radius is given by

R=322G(3π22mn8M)1/3

(c) Show that the radius of a neutron star whose mass is twice that of our Sun is only about10km .

Using the relationship between temperature and MandN given in (9-16) and that betweenE andn in (9-6), obtain equation (9-17) from (9- 12). The first sum given In Exercise 30 will be useful.

Verify that the probabilities shown in Table 9.1 for four distinguishable oscillators sharing energy 2δEagree with the exact probabilities given by equation (9-9).

Consider a simple thermodynamic system in which particles can occupy only two states: a lower state, whose energy we define as 0 , and an upper state, energyEu

(a) Cany out the sum (with only two states, integration is certainly not valid) giving the average particle energy E. and plot your result as a function of temperature.

(b) Explain qualitatively why it should behave as it does,

(c) This system can be used as a model of paramagnetic, where individual atoms' magnetic moments can either be aligned or anti aligned with an external magnetic field, giving a low or high energy, respectively. Describe how the average alignment or antialignment depends on temperature. Does it make sense'?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free