From elementary electrostatics the total electrostatic potential energy in a sphere of uniform charge Q and radius R is given by

U=3Q25×4π0R

(a) What would be the energy per charge in a lead nucleus if it could be treated as 82 protons distributed uniformly throughout a sphere of radiusrole="math" localid="1659180305412" 7×10-15m

(b) How does this result fit with Exercise 87?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The energy per charge in a lead nucleus is10.1MeV/proton .

(b) The value obtained at least falls within the proper order of magnitude to explain the discrepancy in Exercise 87

Step by step solution

01

Identification of given data

The given data can be listed below,

  • The radius of the uniformly charged sphere is,R
  • The potential energy of the sphere is,U=3Q220π0R
02

Concept/Significance of potential energy

A force field's presence in an area causes an energy to arise. A positive charge, Q, will cause all other charges to have electric potential energy if it is present because of its electric field.

03

(a) Determination of the energy per charge in a lead nucleus if it could be treated as 82 protons distributed uniformly throughout a sphere

The total potential energy of the lead nucleus is given by,

U=3zQ220π0R

Here, zis the number of protons, Qis the charge on the nucleus, and Ris the radius of the sphere,

Substitute all the values in the above,

role="math" localid="1659181281067" U=3582×1.6×10-19C24×3.148.85×10-12C2/Nm27×10-15m=41.68×10-11J3.14=1.33×10-11J

So, the energy per proton is given by,

Up=Uz

Substitute all the values in the above,

Up=1.33×10-10J82proton6.242×1018eV1J=10.1MeV/proton

Thus, the energy per charge in a lead nucleus is10.1MeV/proton .

04

(b) Determination of the result whether fit with Exercise 87 or not.

In exercise 87 neutrons do not repel one another, whereas protons do. The protons' energy levels should increase in comparison to the neutrons because of the repelling energy.so, the proton energies should rise due to repulsion.

Thus, the value obtained at least falls within the proper order of magnitude to explain the discrepancy in Exercise 87.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 52 gives the Boltzmann distribution for the special case of simple harmonic oscillators, expressed in terms of the constantε, Nω0/(2s+1)and Exercise 53 gives the two quantum distributions in that case. Show that both quantum distributions converge to the Boltzmann in the limitkBT.

The electrons’ contribution to the heat capacity of a metal is small and goes to 0as T0. We might try to calculate it via the total internal energy, localid="1660131882505" U=EN(E)D(E)dE, but it is one of those integrals impossible to do in closed form, and localid="1660131274621" N(E)FDis the culprit. Still, we can explain why the heat capacity should go to zero and obtain a rough value.

(a) Starting withN(E)FDexpressed as in equation (34), show that the slope N(E)FDdEatE=EFis-1(4kBT).

(b) Based on part (a), the accompanying figure is a good approximation to N(E)FDwhen Tis small. In a normal gas, such as air, whenTis raised a little, all molecules, on average, gain a little energy, proportional to kBT. Thus, the internal energy Uincreases linearly with T, and the heat capacity, UT, is roughly constant. Argue on the basis of the figure that in this fermion gas, as the temperature increases from 0to a small value T, while some particles gain energy of roughly kBT, not all do, and the number doing so is also roughly proportional to localid="1660131824460" T. What effect does this have on the heat capacity?

(c)Viewing the total energy increase as simply U= (number of particles whose energy increases) (energy change per particle) and assuming the density of states is simply a constant Dover the entire range of particle energies, show that the heat capacity under these lowest-temperature conditions should be proportional to kBREFT. (Trying to be more precise is not really worthwhile, for the proportionality constant is subject to several corrections from effects we ignore).

Obtain equation (9- 15) from (9-14). Make use or the following sums, correct when |x|<1 :

n=0xn=11-xn=0nxn=x(1-x)2

A. block has a cavity inside, occupied by a photon gas. Briefly explain what the characteristic of this gas should have to do with the temperature of the block.

The entropy of an ideal monatomic gas is(3/2)NkBlnE+,NkBlnV-NkBlnN to within an additive constant. Show that this implies the correct relationship between internal energy Eand temperature.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free