Obtain a semi empirical binding energy per nucleon formula. Using this as a guide, explain why the Coulomb force, which is only about1100as strong as the inter nucleon attraction for two protons "in contact" (cf. Table 11.2), would eventually have to become a dominant factor in large nuclei. Assume that Z,N and A increase in rough proportion to one another.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Coulomb term will dominate eventually.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

c1=15.8,c2=17.8,c3=0.71andc4=23.7.First term in sum is volume term, second term is surface term, third term is Coulomb term and fourth term is asymmetry term. Obtained value of binding energy is in MeV.

02

Formula of Semi empirical binding Energy

Semi empirical binding Energy is given by the expression,

BE=c1A-c2A2/3-c3Z(Z-1)A1/3-c4(N-Z)2A

03

Calculate the semi empirical binding energy

Coulomb force is about 1100as strong as the inter nucleon attraction for two protons in contact.

The semi empirical binding energy formula is BE=c1A-c2A2/3-c3Z(Z-1)A2/3-c4(N-Z)2A.

So, this formula for binding energy per nucleon would be:

BE=1Ac1A-c2A2/3-c3Z(Z-1)A2/3-c4(N-Z)2ABE=c1-c2A1/3-c3Z(Z-1)A1/34-c4(N-Z)2A

If the atomic number is proportional to number of nucleons, the third term will increase like A2/3 while all the other terms decrease as number of nucleons increase.

Thus, the Coulomb term will dominate eventually.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle is subject to a potential energy that has an essentially infinitely high wall at the origin, like the infinite well, but for positive values of x is of the form U(x)= -b/ x, where b is a constant

(a) Sketch this potential energy.

(b) How much energy could a classical particle have and still be bound by such a potential energy?

(c) Add to your sketch a plot of E for a bound particle and indicate the outer classical tuning point (the inner being the origin).

(d) Assuming that a quantum-mechanical description is in order, sketch a plausible ground-state wave function, making sure that your function's second derivative is of the proper sign when U(x)is less than E and when it is greater.

A function f(α)is nonzero only in the region of width 2δcentered atα=0

f(α)={Cαδ0αδ

where C is a constant.

(a) Find and plot versus βthe Fourier transform A(β)of this function.

(b) The function ρα) might represent a pulse occupying either finite distance (localid="1659781367200" α=position) or finite time (α=time). Comment on the wave number if α=is position and on the frequency spectrum if αis time. Specifically address the dependence of the width of the spectrum on δ.

It is shown in section 6.1 that for the E<U0 potential step, B=-α+ikα-ikA. Use it to calculate the probability density to the left of the step:

|ψx<0|2=|Aeikx+Be-ikx|2

  1. Show that the result is, 4|A|2sin2(kx-θ)where θ=tan-1(k/α). Because the reflected wave is of the same amplitude as the incident, this is a typical standing wave pattern varying between 0and 4A*A.
  2. Determine data-custom-editor="chemistry" θand Din the limits kanddata-custom-editor="chemistry" αtend to 0and interpret your results.

Prove that fur any sine function sin(kx+ϕ)of wavelength shorter than 2a, where ais the atomic spacing. there is a sine function with a wavelength longer than 2a that has the same values at the points x = a , 2a , 3a . and so on. (Note: It is probably easier to work with wave number than with wavelength. We sick to show that for every wave number greater than there is an equivalent less than π/a.)

As we see in Figures 10.23, in a one dimensional crystal of finite wells, top of the band states closely resemble infinite well states. In fact, the famous particle in a box energy formula gives a fair value for the energies of the band to which they belong. (a) If for nin that formula you use the number of anitnodes in the whole function, what would you use for the box length L? (b) If, instead, the n in the formula were taken to refer to band n, could you still use the formula? If so, what would you use for L? (c) Explain why the energies in a band do or do not depend on the size of the crystal as a whole.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free