Electromagnetic "waves" strike a single slit of1μmwidth. Determine the angular full width (angle from first minimum on one side of the center to first minimum on the other) in degrees of the central diffraction maximum if the waves are (a) visible light of wavelength 500 nmand (b) X-rays of wavelength 0.05 nm. (c) Which more clearly demonstrates a wave nature?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The wave particle duality if visible light is there is 60°.

(b) The wave particle duality if x-ray is there is 5.72x10-3°.

(c) The visible light will more clearly demonstrate the wave nature

Step by step solution

01

Identification of the given data

The given data is listed as follows,

The width of the single slit is, a=1μmx1x10-6m1μm=1x10-6m

The wavelength of the visible light is, λ1=500nm×1×10-9m1nm=500×10-9m

The wavelength of x-ray is, λ2=0.05nm×1×10-9m1nm=0.05×10-9m

02

Representation of the single slit diffraction formula

The single slit diffraction formula is expressed as follows,

asin(θ)=

Here, a is the width of the single slit, λis the wavelength of the light wave, n is the order of the minimum, and θis the angle with the direction of the light.

03

(a) Determination of wave-particle duality if visible light is there

Rearrange the single slit diffraction formula.

θ=sin-1a

Substitute all the values in the above expression.

θ=sin-11×500×10-9m1×10-6m=30°

It is known that the angular full width θis twice the above value. So, multiply the above value by 2.

θ=2×30°=60°

Thus, the wave particle duality if visible light is there is 60°.

04

(b) Determination of wave-particle duality if x-ray is there

Rearrange the single slit diffraction formula.

θ=sin-1a

Substitute all the values in the above expression.

θ=sin-11×0.05×10-9m1×10-6m=2.86×10-3°

It is known that the angular full width θis twice the above value. So, multiply the above value by 2.

θ=(2×86×10-3)°=5.72×10-3°

Thus, the wave particle duality if x-ray is there is 5.72×10-3°.

05

(c) Identification of the most clear wave nature

Generally, as the wavelength increases, the wave nature (diffraction) of the light dominates which is the case of visible light here. In addition, the results indicate that the particle nature will become significant as the wavelength of the incident particles is much less than the width of the slit which is the case for the -ray here.

Thus, the visible light will more clearly demonstrate the wave nature.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculate the probability that the electron in a hydrogen atom would be found within 30 degrees of the xy-plane, irrespective of radius, for (a) I=0 ,m1=0; (b) role="math" localid="1660014331933" I=1,mI=±1and (c) I=2,mI=±2. (d) As angular momentum increases, what happens to the orbits whose z-components of angular momentum are the maximum allowed?

Obtain a semi empirical binding energy per nucleon formula. Using this as a guide, explain why the Coulomb force, which is only about1100as strong as the inter nucleon attraction for two protons "in contact" (cf. Table 11.2), would eventually have to become a dominant factor in large nuclei. Assume that Z,N and A increase in rough proportion to one another.

Here we investigate the link between nand l, reflected in equation (7-33). (a) Show that if a classical point charge were held in a circular orbit about a fixed point charge by the Coulomb force, its kinetic energy would be given by KE=e2/8πε0r (b) According to equation (7-30), the rotational kinetic energy in hydrogen is h2l(l+1)/2mr2. Of course, ris not well defined for a “cloud”, but by usingr=n2a0argue that the condition that l not exceed n is reasonable.

As we see in Figures 10.23, in a one dimensional crystal of finite wells, top of the band states closely resemble infinite well states. In fact, the famous particle in a box energy formula gives a fair value for the energies of the band to which they belong. (a) If for nin that formula you use the number of anitnodes in the whole function, what would you use for the box length L? (b) If, instead, the n in the formula were taken to refer to band n, could you still use the formula? If so, what would you use for L? (c) Explain why the energies in a band do or do not depend on the size of the crystal as a whole.

Obtain the smoothness conditions at the boundaries between regions for the E<U0barrier (i.e., tunneling) case.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free