If things really do have a dual wave-particle nature, then if the wave spreads, the probability of finding the particle should spread proportionally, independent of the degree of spreading, mass, speed, and even Planck’s constant. Imagine that a beam of particles of mass m and speedv, moving in the x direction, passes through a single slit of width w . Show that the angle θ1at which the first diffraction minimum would be found ( nλ=wsinθn, from physical optics) is proportional to the angle at which the particle would likely be deflected θpyp , and that the proportionality factor is a pure number, independent of m, v, w and h . (Assume small angles: sinθtanθθ).

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is shown thatθ1=4πθθ1αθ

Step by step solution

01

The diffraction minimum:

It is known that the diffraction minimum can be obtained atθ1=λw

02

Required Proof:

Since, θ1is a very small angle, then

θ1θ1

Here,θ1is the angle at which the first diffraction minimum is obtained. So,

θ1=λwθ1=hmvw

Now, the angle at which the particle deflected is

θ=pyp ….. (1)

Since, it is known that

ypyh2

And the momentum, p = mv

So, substitute the above value into the angle equation (1), and you have

θh(2y)(mv)h2wmvh4πmvw

Now, from the above calculations, you can say that θ1=4πθθ1αθand the proportionality factor is a pure number equals 4π.

Hence, it is proved that θ1αθand the proportionality factor is a pure number.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are in a bus travelling on a straight road at 20m/s. As you pass a gas station, your clock and a clock in station read precisely 0. You pass another gas station 900m farther down the road. (in the frame of reference of the gas stations., all gas station clocks synchronized.) (a) As you pass the: second station, do you find its clock to be ahead of, or: behind your own clock and (b) by how much?

Calculate the probability that the electron in a hydrogen atom would be found within 30 degrees of the xy-plane, irrespective of radius, for (a) I=0 ,m1=0; (b) role="math" localid="1660014331933" I=1,mI=±1and (c) I=2,mI=±2. (d) As angular momentum increases, what happens to the orbits whose z-components of angular momentum are the maximum allowed?

In section 10.2 , we discussed two-lobed px,pyandpzand states and 4 lobed hybrid sp3 states. Another kind of hybrid state that sticks out in just one direction is the sp, formed from a single p state and an s state. Consider an arbitrary combination of the 2s state with the 2pz state. Let us represent this bycos2,0,0+sin2,1,0(The trig factors ensure normalization in carrying out the integral , cross terms integrate to 0.leaving

cos2τ|ψ2,0,0|2dv+sin2τ|ψ2.1.0|2dv Which is 1.)

  1. Calculate the probability that an electron in such a state would be in the +z-hemisphere.(Note: Here, the cross terms so not integrate to 0 )
  2. What value of𝛕leads to the maximum probability, and what is the corresponding ratio ofψ2.0.0 andψ2.0.0 ?
  3. Using a computer , make a density (Shading) plot of the probability density-density versus r and𝛉- for the𝛕-value found in part (b).

The density of copper is8.9×103kgm3. Its femi energy is 7.0 eV, and it has one conduction electron per atom. At liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K), its resistivity is about 4×10-9Ωm. Estimate how far a conduction electron would travel before colliding and how many copper ions it would pass.

Question: From equation (6.33), we conclude that the group velocity of a matter wave group equals the velocity V0 of the massive particle with which it is associated. However both the dispersion relation used to show that vgroup=hk0/m and the formula used to relatethis to the particle velocity are relativistically incorrect. It might be argued that we proved what we wished to prove by making an even number of mistakes.

a. Using the relativistically correct dispersion relation given in Exercise 4.1show that the group velocity of a wave pulse is actually given by

vgroup=hk0c2(hk0)2c2+m2c4

b. The fundamental relationshipρ=hk is universally connect. So is indeed the particle momentum ρ. (it is not well defined. but this is its approximate or central value) Making this substitution in the expression forvgroupfrom part (a). then using the relativistically correct, relationship between momentumρ and panicle velocity v,show that the group velocity again is equal to the panicle velocity.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free