If things really do have a dual wave-particle nature, then if the wave spreads, the probability of finding the particle should spread proportionally, independent of the degree of spreading, mass, speed, and even Planck’s constant. Imagine that a beam of particles of mass m and speedv, moving in the x direction, passes through a single slit of width w . Show that the angle θ1at which the first diffraction minimum would be found ( nλ=wsinθn, from physical optics) is proportional to the angle at which the particle would likely be deflected θpyp , and that the proportionality factor is a pure number, independent of m, v, w and h . (Assume small angles: sinθtanθθ).

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is shown thatθ1=4πθθ1αθ

Step by step solution

01

The diffraction minimum:

It is known that the diffraction minimum can be obtained atθ1=λw

02

Required Proof:

Since, θ1is a very small angle, then

θ1θ1

Here,θ1is the angle at which the first diffraction minimum is obtained. So,

θ1=λwθ1=hmvw

Now, the angle at which the particle deflected is

θ=pyp ….. (1)

Since, it is known that

ypyh2

And the momentum, p = mv

So, substitute the above value into the angle equation (1), and you have

θh(2y)(mv)h2wmvh4πmvw

Now, from the above calculations, you can say that θ1=4πθθ1αθand the proportionality factor is a pure number equals 4π.

Hence, it is proved that θ1αθand the proportionality factor is a pure number.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Doubly ionized lithium , Li2, absorbs a photon and jumps from the ground state to its n=2level. What was the wavelength of the photon?

In section 10.2 , we discussed two-lobed px,pyandpzand states and 4 lobed hybrid sp3 states. Another kind of hybrid state that sticks out in just one direction is the sp, formed from a single p state and an s state. Consider an arbitrary combination of the 2s state with the 2pz state. Let us represent this bycos2,0,0+sin2,1,0(The trig factors ensure normalization in carrying out the integral , cross terms integrate to 0.leaving

cos2τ|ψ2,0,0|2dv+sin2τ|ψ2.1.0|2dv Which is 1.)

  1. Calculate the probability that an electron in such a state would be in the +z-hemisphere.(Note: Here, the cross terms so not integrate to 0 )
  2. What value of𝛕leads to the maximum probability, and what is the corresponding ratio ofψ2.0.0 andψ2.0.0 ?
  3. Using a computer , make a density (Shading) plot of the probability density-density versus r and𝛉- for the𝛕-value found in part (b).

For waves on the surf ace of water, the behaviour of long wavelengths is dominated by gravitational effects-a liquid "seeking its own level." Short wavelengths are dominated by surface tension effects. Taking both into account, the dispersion relation isω=gk+(γ/ρ)k3. whereγis the surface tension,p is the density of water, and gis, of course, the gravitational acceleration?

  1. Make a qualitative sketch of group velocity versus wave number. How does it behave for very large k? For very small k?
  2. (b) Find the minimum possible group velocity and the wavelength at which it occurs.Useγ=0.072N/m,ρ=103kg/m3andg=9.8m/s2.

Question: From equation (6.33), we conclude that the group velocity of a matter wave group equals the velocity V0 of the massive particle with which it is associated. However both the dispersion relation used to show that vgroup=hk0/m and the formula used to relatethis to the particle velocity are relativistically incorrect. It might be argued that we proved what we wished to prove by making an even number of mistakes.

a. Using the relativistically correct dispersion relation given in Exercise 4.1show that the group velocity of a wave pulse is actually given by

vgroup=hk0c2(hk0)2c2+m2c4

b. The fundamental relationshipρ=hk is universally connect. So is indeed the particle momentum ρ. (it is not well defined. but this is its approximate or central value) Making this substitution in the expression forvgroupfrom part (a). then using the relativistically correct, relationship between momentumρ and panicle velocity v,show that the group velocity again is equal to the panicle velocity.

Nuclei of the same mass number but different Zare known as isobars. Oxygen-15 and nitrogen- 15 are isobars.

(a) In which of the factors considered in nuclear binding (represented by terms in the semi empirical binding energy formula) do these two isobars differ?

(b) Which of the isobars should be more tightly bound?

(c) k your conclusion in part (b) supported by the decay mode information of Appendix 1? Explain.

(d) Calculate the binding energies of oxygen-15 and nitrogen-15. By how much do they differ?

(e) Repeat part (d) but use the semi empirical binding energy formula rather than the known atomic masses.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free