Could the situation depicted in the following diagram represent a particle in a bound state? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The answer is no.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of bound state

The bound state of a particle is defined as the quantum state in which a particle has a tendency to remain localized in space when subjected to a potential barrier.

02

Explanation and conclusion

The particle within any barrier would hit walls back and forth. But in case of this potential, the particle will keep on bouncing back and forth and eventually get out of the barrier.

Hence, this diagram does not depict a bound state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As we learn in physical optics, thin-film interference can cause some wavelengths of light to be strongly reflected while others not reflected at all. Neglecting absorption all light has to go one way or the other, so wavelengths not reflected are strongly transmitted. (a) For a film, of thickness t surrounded by air, what wavelengths λ (while they are within the film) will be strongly transmitted? (b) What wavelengths (while they are “over” the barrier) of matter waves satisfies condition (6-14)? (c) Comment on the relationship between (a) and (b).

A beam of particles of energy E incident upon a potential step ofU0=(5/4)E is described by wave function:ψinc(x)=eikx

  1. Determine the reflected wave and wave inside the step by enforcing the required continuity conditions to obtain their (possibly complex) amplitudes.
  2. Verify the explicit calculation the ratio of reflected probability density to the incident probability density is 1.

Show that if you attempt to detect a particle while tunneling, your experiment must render its kinetic energy so uncertain that it might well be "over the top."

To obtain a rough estimate of the mean time required for uranium-238 to alpha-decay, let us approximate the combined electrostatic and strong nuclear potential energies by rectangular potential barrier half as high as the actual 35 Mev maximum potential energy. Alpha particles (mass 4 u) of 4.3 Mev kinetic energy are incident. Let us also assume that the barrier extends from the radius of nucleus, 7.4 fm to the point where the electrostatic potential drops to 4.3 Mev (i.e., the classically forbidden region). Because Uα(1/r), this point is 35/4.3 times the radius of the nucleus, the point at which U(r) is 35 Mev. (a) Use these crude approximations, the method suggested in Section 6.3, and the wide-barrier approximation to obtain a value for the time it takes to decay. (b) To gain some appreciation of the difficulties in a theoretical prediction, work the exercise “backward” Rather than assuming a value for U0, use the known value of the mean time to decay for uranium-238 and infer the corresponding value of U0, Retain all other assumptions. (c) Comment on the sensitivity of the decay time to the height of the potential barrier.

Verify that the reflection and transmission probabilities given in equation (6-7) add to 1.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free