Consider a potential barrier of height 30eV. (a) Find a width around1.000nmfor which there will be no reflection of 35eVelectrons incident upon the barrier. (b) What would be the reflection probability for 36eVelectrons incident upon the same barrier? (Note: This corresponds to a difference in speed of less than1(1/2)%.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The width is 1.098nmand the reflection probability is0.475.

Step by step solution

01

Definition:

Tunneling defines the penetration of a barrier of high energy by a low-energy wave or particle. For no reflection,E>U. This is called resonant transmission.

E=U0+n2π222mL2

Reflection probability or reflection coefficient is defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the reflected wave to that of the incident wave.

R=sin22m(E+U0)Lsin22m(E+U0)L+4EU0EU0+1

02

Given/known parameters

E=35eVandU=30eV

03

Solution

(a)nL=2m(E-U)π

nL=2×9.1×10-31×35-30×1.6×10-19J/eV3.14×1.05×10-34

nL=3.64×109

If L=1nm,n=3.64. Rounding off to the nearest integral value,n=4.This gives L=1.098nm.

(b)Putting values in reflection formula:

R=sin22×9.1×10-31(36-30)×1.6×10-19×1.0981.05×10-34in22×9.1×10-31(36-30)×1.6×10-19×1.0981.05×10-34+4(3630)3630-1

R=0.475

04

Explanation and Conclusion

For a barrier width of1.098nm,no reflection will take place.

Reflection coefficient for36eVbeam is 0.475. It is quite small, which means the window for resonant transmission can be small.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given the same particle energy and barrier height and width, which would tunnel more readily: a proton or an electron? Is this consistent with the usual rule of thumb governing whether classical or non-classical behavior should prevail?

The plot below shows the variation of ω with k for electrons in a simple crystal. Where, if anywhere, does the group velocity exceed the phase velocity? (Sketching straight lines from the origin may help.) The trend indicated by a dashed curve is parabolic, but it is interrupted by a curious discontinuity, known as a band gap (see Chapter 10), where there are no allowed frequencies/energies. It turns out that the second derivative ofω with respect to k is inversely proportional to the effective mass of the electron. Argue that in this crystal, the effective mass is the same for most values of k, but that it is different for some values and in one region in a very strange way.

Question: Obtain equation (6.18) from(6.16) and (6.17).

A ball is thrown straight up at 25ms-1. Someone asks “Ignoring air resistance. What is the probability of the ball tunneling to a height of1000m?” Explain why this is not an example of tunneling as discussed in this chapter, even if the ball were replaced with a small fundamental particle. (The fact that the potential energy varies with position is not the whole answer-passing through nonrectangular barriers is still tunnelirl8.)

Show that ψ(x)=A'eikx+B'e-ikxis equivalent to ψ(x)=Asinkx+Bcoskx, provided that A'=12(B-iA)B'=12(B+iA).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free