Chapter 6: Q3CQ (page 223)
Why is the topic of normalization practically absent from Sections 6.1 and 6.2?
Short Answer
We don’t normalize with multiple particles as with a single particle.
Chapter 6: Q3CQ (page 223)
Why is the topic of normalization practically absent from Sections 6.1 and 6.2?
We don’t normalize with multiple particles as with a single particle.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn the potential barrier, there should be no reflection when the incident wave is at one of the transmission resonances. Prove this by assuming that a beam of particles is incident at the first transmission resonance, , and combining continuity equations to show that. (Note: k’ is particularly simple in this special case, which should streamline your work.)
Exercise 39 gives a condition for resonant tunneling through two barriers separated by a space width of, expressed I terms of factorgiven in exercise 30. Show that in the limit in which barrier width, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition (5.22) for finite well. Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.
Particles of energy Eare incident from the left, where U(x)=0, and at the origin encounter an abrupt drop in potential energy, whose depth is -3E.
How should you answer someone who asks, “In tunneling through a simple barrier, which way are particles moving, in the three regions--before, inside, and after the barrier?”
A beam of particles of energy E incident upon a potential step ofE is described by wave function:
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.