Why is the topic of normalization practically absent from Sections 6.1 and 6.2?

Short Answer

Expert verified

We don’t normalize with multiple particles as with a single particle.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of normalization

Normalization is defined as the scaling of all wave functions of a quantum state to an exact form such that all probabilities of finding a particle anywhere in space add up to 1.

02

Explanation and conclusion

In this section, plane waves are used for the representation of a single particle or a group of particles behaving as one coherent wave and studying its reflection and transmission coefficients. For multiple particles, we usually don’t normalize for unit probability but seek the multiplicative coefficients.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that ψ(x)=A'eikx+B'e-ikxis equivalent to ψ(x)=Asinkx+Bcoskx, provided that A'=12(B-iA)B'=12(B+iA).

The diagram below plots ω(k) versus wave number for a particular phenomenon. How do the phase and group velocities compare, and do the answer depend on the central value of k under consideration? Explain.

The equations for Rand T in the E>U0barrier essentially the same as light through a transparent film. It is possible to fabricate a thin film that reflects no light. Is it possible to fabricate one that transmits no light? Why? Why not?

Fusion in the Sun: Without tunnelling. our Sun would fail us. The source of its energy is nuclear fusion. and a crucial step is the fusion of a light-hydrogen nucleus, which is just a proton, and a heavy-hydrogen nucleus. which is of the same charge but twice the mass. When these nuclei get close enough. their short-range attraction via the strong force overcomes their Coulomb repulsion. This allows them to stick together, resulting in a reduced total mass/internal energy and a consequent release of kinetic energy. However, the Sun's temperature is simply too low to ensure that nuclei move fast enough to overcome their repulsion.

a) By equating the average thermal kinetic energy that the nuclei would have when distant,32KBT. and the Coulomb potential energy they would have when 2fm apart, roughly the separation at which they stick, show that a temperature of about 1019K would be needed.

b) The Sun's core is only about 10k. If nuclei can’t make it "over the top." they must tunnel. Consider the following model, illustrated in the figure: One nucleus is fixed at the origin, while the other approaches from far away with energyE. As rdecreases, the Coulomb potential energy increases, until the separation ris roughly the nuclear radius rnuc. Whereupon the potential energy is Umaxand then quickly drops down into a very deep "hole" as the strong-force attraction takes over. Given then EUmax, the point b, where tunnelling must begin. will be very large compared with rnuc, so we approximate the barrier's width Las simply b. Its height, U0, we approximate by the Coulomb potential evaluated at b2. Finally. for the energy Ewhich fixes b, let us use 4×32KBT. which is a reasonable limit, given the natural range of speeds in a thermodynamic system.Combining these approximations, show that the exponential factor in the wide-barrier tunnelling probability is

exp[-e24πε0h4m3kBT]

c)Using the proton mass for , evaluate this factor for a temperature of107K. Then evaluate it at3000K. about that of an incandescent filament or hot flame. and rather high by Earth standards. Discuss the consequences.

For particles incident from the left on the potential energy shown below, what incident energies E would imply a possibility of later being found infinitely far to the right? Does your answer depend on whether the particles behave classically or quantum-mechanically?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free