Exercise 39 gives a condition for resonant tunneling through two barriers separated by a space width of2s, expressed I terms of factorβgiven in exercise 30. Show that in the limit in which barrier widthL, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition (5.22) for finite well. Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.

Short Answer

Expert verified

In the limit in which barrier width L, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition (5-22) for finite well. Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.

Step by step solution

01

Concepts involved

Resonant tunneling is a phenomenon in which an electron enters from one side of a double barrier structure, and travels across it at or near the metastable levels in the quantum well.

02

Given parameters

The condition for resonant tunneling from the Exercise 39 is given by,

2s=β/k

Where, β=tan12αkk2α2coth(αL).

k= wave number

L = barrier width

α =constant

03

Show that in the limit in which barrier width L→∞, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition

In the limit Lcoth1 and so:

β=tan12αkk2α22sk=tan12αkk2α2tan(2sk)=2αkk2α2

Rearranging, 2cot(k.2s)=kααk

2s is the distance between the barriers; this is same as the expression (5.22) which is the energy quantization condition.

Here, the condition of resonant tunneling is proved to be equal to the energy quantization condition, whenL . Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fusion in the Sun: Without tunnelling. our Sun would fail us. The source of its energy is nuclear fusion. and a crucial step is the fusion of a light-hydrogen nucleus, which is just a proton, and a heavy-hydrogen nucleus. which is of the same charge but twice the mass. When these nuclei get close enough. their short-range attraction via the strong force overcomes their Coulomb repulsion. This allows them to stick together, resulting in a reduced total mass/internal energy and a consequent release of kinetic energy. However, the Sun's temperature is simply too low to ensure that nuclei move fast enough to overcome their repulsion.

a) By equating the average thermal kinetic energy that the nuclei would have when distant,32KBT. and the Coulomb potential energy they would have when 2fm apart, roughly the separation at which they stick, show that a temperature of about 1019K would be needed.

b) The Sun's core is only about 10k. If nuclei can’t make it "over the top." they must tunnel. Consider the following model, illustrated in the figure: One nucleus is fixed at the origin, while the other approaches from far away with energyE. As rdecreases, the Coulomb potential energy increases, until the separation ris roughly the nuclear radius rnuc. Whereupon the potential energy is Umaxand then quickly drops down into a very deep "hole" as the strong-force attraction takes over. Given then EUmax, the point b, where tunnelling must begin. will be very large compared with rnuc, so we approximate the barrier's width Las simply b. Its height, U0, we approximate by the Coulomb potential evaluated at b2. Finally. for the energy Ewhich fixes b, let us use 4×32KBT. which is a reasonable limit, given the natural range of speeds in a thermodynamic system.Combining these approximations, show that the exponential factor in the wide-barrier tunnelling probability is

exp[-e24πε0h4m3kBT]

c)Using the proton mass for , evaluate this factor for a temperature of107K. Then evaluate it at3000K. about that of an incandescent filament or hot flame. and rather high by Earth standards. Discuss the consequences.

For a general wave pulse neither E nor p (i.eneither ωnor k)areweIldefined. But they have approximate values E0andp0. Although it comprisemany plane waves, the general pulse has an overall phase velocity corresponding to these values.

vphase=ω0k0=E0/hp0/h=E0p0

If the pulse describes a large massive particle. The uncertaintiesarereasonably small, and the particle may be said to have energy E0and momentum p0.Usingtherelativisticallycorrect expressions for energy and momentum. Show that the overall phase velocity is greater thancand given by

vphase=c2uparticle

Note that the phase velocity is greatest for particles whose speed is least.

Consider a potential barrier of height 30eV. (a) Find a width around1.000nmfor which there will be no reflection of 35eVelectrons incident upon the barrier. (b) What would be the reflection probability for 36eVelectrons incident upon the same barrier? (Note: This corresponds to a difference in speed of less than1(1/2)%.

To obtain a rough estimate of the mean time required for uranium-238 to alpha-decay, let us approximate the combined electrostatic and strong nuclear potential energies by rectangular potential barrier half as high as the actual 35 Mev maximum potential energy. Alpha particles (mass 4 u) of 4.3 Mev kinetic energy are incident. Let us also assume that the barrier extends from the radius of nucleus, 7.4 fm to the point where the electrostatic potential drops to 4.3 Mev (i.e., the classically forbidden region). Because Uα(1/r), this point is 35/4.3 times the radius of the nucleus, the point at which U(r) is 35 Mev. (a) Use these crude approximations, the method suggested in Section 6.3, and the wide-barrier approximation to obtain a value for the time it takes to decay. (b) To gain some appreciation of the difficulties in a theoretical prediction, work the exercise “backward” Rather than assuming a value for U0, use the known value of the mean time to decay for uranium-238 and infer the corresponding value of U0, Retain all other assumptions. (c) Comment on the sensitivity of the decay time to the height of the potential barrier.

Why is the topic of normalization practically absent from Sections 6.1 and 6.2?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free