Suppose we produce X-rays not by smashing electrons into targets but by smashing protons, which are far more massive. If the same accelerating potential difference were used for both, how would the cut off wavelengths of the two X-ray spectra compare? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The cut-off wavelengths will be the same in both cases.

Step by step solution

01

Given Data

X-rays are produced by smashing protons instead of electrons using the same potential difference.

02

Emission of X-rays

The x-rays are energetic electromagnetic radiation having shorter wavelengths, which are produced X-rays are emitted from the metal surface when the energy of the bombarding particles is more than the work function of the given metal.

03

Relation between kinetic energy, work function, and wavelength

The following equation represents the relation between kinetic energy, work function, and wavelength of spectra.

hv=Ek+ϕv=cλhcλ=Ek+ϕhcλ=qV+ϕλ=hcqV+ϕ

Where,

data-custom-editor="chemistry" λ is the wavelength of the spectra, c is the speed of light in the vacuum, Ek=eV is the kinetic energy of a particle, q is the charge of the particle, V is the potential difference in Volts, data-custom-editor="chemistry" ϕis the work function of the metal, and h is the Planck's constant.

04

Wavelength of spectra

The cut-off wavelength depends upon the charge of the particle, potential difference, and work function of the metal. As the charge of a proton is equal to that of an electron, the cut-off wavelength would not be affected by using protons instead of electrons under the same potential difference. Also, the wavelength of spectra does not depend upon the mass of the particle. So, it will not change with the mass of the electron or proton.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When a beam of mono-energetic electrons is directed at a tungsten target, X-rays are produced with wavelengths no shorter than0.062nm . How fast are the electrons in the beam moving?

In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.

(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.

A 0.065nmX-ray source is directed at a sample of carbon. Determine the minimum speed of scattered electrons.

An object moving to the right at 0.8c is struck head-on by a photon of wavelength λ moving to the left. The object absorbs the photon (i.e., the photon disappears) and is afterward moving to the right at 0.6c. (a) Determine the ratio of the object’s mass after the collision to its mass before the collision. (Note: The object is not a “fundamental particle”, and its mass is, therefore, subject to change.) (b) Does Kinetic energy increase or decrease?

A bedrock topic in quantum mechanics is the uncertainty principle. It is discussed mostly for massive objects in Chapter 4, but the idea also applies to light: Increasing certainty in knowledge of photon position implies increasing uncertainty in knowledge of its momentum, and vice versa. A single-slit pattern that is developed (like the double-slit pattern of Section 3.6) one photon at a time provides a good example. Depicted in the accompanying figure, the pattern shows that pho tons emerging from a narrow slit are spreadall-over; a photon's x-component of momentum can be any value over a broad range and is thus uncertain. On the other hand, the x -coordinate of position of an emerging photon covers a fairly small range, for w is small. Using the single-slit diffractionformula =wsinθ , show that the range of likely values of px, which is roughly psinθ , is inversely proportional to the range w of likely position values. Thus, an inherent wave nature implies that the precisions with which the particle properties of position and momentum can be known are inversely proportional.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free