Chapter 3: Q23E (page 93)
Light of wave length590nm is barely able to eject electrons from a metal plate. What would be the speed of the fastest electrons ejected by the light of one-third the wavelength?
Short Answer
The metal is sodium.
Chapter 3: Q23E (page 93)
Light of wave length590nm is barely able to eject electrons from a metal plate. What would be the speed of the fastest electrons ejected by the light of one-third the wavelength?
The metal is sodium.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA gamma-ray photon changes into a proton-antiproton pair. Ignoring momentum conservation, what must have been the wavelength of the photon (a) if the pair is stationary after creation, and (b) if each moves off at , perpendicular to the motion of the photon? (c) Assume that these interactions occur as the photon encounters a lead plate and that a lead nucleus participates in momentum conservation. In each case, what fraction of the photon's energy must be absorbed by a lead nucleus?
An object moving to the right at 0.8c is struck head-on by a photon of wavelength moving to the left. The object absorbs the photon (i.e., the photon disappears) and is afterward moving to the right at 0.6c. (a) Determine the ratio of the object’s mass after the collision to its mass before the collision. (Note: The object is not a “fundamental particle”, and its mass is, therefore, subject to change.) (b) Does Kinetic energy increase or decrease?
In positron emission tomography (PET), discussed in progress and Applications, an electron and positron annihilate, and two photons of characteristic energy are detected. What is this energy and what is the corresponding wavelength? The pair can be assumed to be essentially stationary before annihilation.
You are conducting a photoelectric effect experiment by shining a light of 500 nmwavelength at a piece of metal and determining the stopping potential. If, unbeknownst to you, your 500 nm source actually contained a small amount of ultraviolet light, would it throw off your results by a small amount, or by quite a bit? Explain.
A typical ionization energy - the energy needed to remove an electron—for the elements is 10 eV. Explain why the energy binding the electron to its atom can be ignored in Compton scattering involving an X-ray photon with wavelength about one-tenth of a nanometer
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.