Using the high-precision values of h,cand egiven on the text's inside front cover, show that the product hccan be expressed as1240eV·nm

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is proved that the product of hc is 1240 eV.nm.

Step by step solution

01

Significance of Planck’s Constant

The relationship between the frequency of a photon and the energy of that photon is defined by Planck’s Constant. It explains the nature of particles and waves. It is denoted by h.

02

Determination of the value of  

It is known that h=6.62607004×10-34J.s, and c=2.99792458×108m/s.

Determine the value of hc by taking the product of h and c.

hc=6.62607004×10-34J.s×2.99792458×108m/s=1.98644582×10-25J.s

Consider that the potential difference of 1V is applied on an electron.

Write the expression for the electric energy.

E = eV

Here, e is the charge on the electron with the value 1.60217662×10-19C.

Substitute all the values in the above expression.

E=1.60217662×10-19C×1V=1.60217662×10-19V·C1eV=1.60217662×10-19J

03

Determination of the value of hc

Convert the units of hc from J to eV.

hc=1.98644582×10-25J×1eV1.60217662×10-19J.m=1.98644582×10-25×1eV1.60217662×10-19J×1×109nm1m=1239.84197eV·nm=1240eV·nm

Thus, it is proved that the product of hc is 1240eV·nm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In positron emission tomography (PET), discussed in progress and Applications, an electron and positron annihilate, and two photons of characteristic energy are detected. What is this energy and what is the corresponding wavelength? The pair can be assumed to be essentially stationary before annihilation.

A typical ionization energy - the energy needed to remove an electron—for the elements is 10 eV. Explain why the energy binding the electron to its atom can be ignored in Compton scattering involving an X-ray photon with wavelength about one-tenth of a nanometer

A bedrock topic in quantum mechanics is the uncertainty principle. It is discussed mostly for massive objects in Chapter 4, but the idea also applies to light: Increasing certainty in knowledge of photon position implies increasing uncertainty in knowledge of its momentum, and vice versa. A single-slit pattern that is developed (like the double-slit pattern of Section 3.6) one photon at a time provides a good example. Depicted in the accompanying figure, the pattern shows that pho tons emerging from a narrow slit are spreadall-over; a photon's x-component of momentum can be any value over a broad range and is thus uncertain. On the other hand, the x -coordinate of position of an emerging photon covers a fairly small range, for w is small. Using the single-slit diffractionformula =wsinθ , show that the range of likely values of px, which is roughly psinθ , is inversely proportional to the range w of likely position values. Thus, an inherent wave nature implies that the precisions with which the particle properties of position and momentum can be known are inversely proportional.

According to Wien's Law, the wavelengthλmax of maximum thermal emission of electromagnetic energy from a body of temperature Tobeys

localid="1660036169367" λmaxT=2.898×10-3m·K

Show that this law follows from the spectral energy density obtained in Exercise 13. Obtain an expression that, when solved, would yield the wavelength at which this function is maximum. The transcendental equation cannot be solved exactly, so it is enough to show thatlocalid="1660036173306" λ=2.898×10-3m·KTsolves it to a reasonable degree of precision.

The charge on a piece of metal can be "watched" fairly easily by connecting it to an electroscope, a device with thin leaves that repel when a net charge is present You place a large excess negative charge on a piece of metal, then separately shine light source of two pure but different colors at it. The first source is extremely bright, but the electroscope shows no change in the net change. The second source is feeble, but the charge disappears. Appealing to as few fundamental claims as possible, explain to your friend what evidence this provides for the particle nature of light.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free