Chapter 3: Q29E (page 94)
When a beam of mono-energetic electrons is directed at a tungsten target, X-rays are produced with wavelengths no shorter than . How fast are the electrons in the beam moving?
Short Answer
The speed of the electrons is
Chapter 3: Q29E (page 94)
When a beam of mono-energetic electrons is directed at a tungsten target, X-rays are produced with wavelengths no shorter than . How fast are the electrons in the beam moving?
The speed of the electrons is
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeSuppose we produce X-rays not by smashing electrons into targets but by smashing protons, which are far more massive. If the same accelerating potential difference were used for both, how would the cut off wavelengths of the two X-ray spectra compare? Explain.
Equation (3-1) expresses Planck's spectral energy density as an energy per range df of frequencies. Quite of ten, it is more convenient to express it as an energy per range of wavelengths, By differentiating we find that . Ignoring the minus sign (we are interested only in relating the magnitudes of the ranges df and ). show that, in terms of wavelength. Planck's formula is
An object moving to the right at 0.8c is struck head-on by a photon of wavelength moving to the left. The object absorbs the photon (i.e., the photon disappears) and is afterward moving to the right at 0.6c. (a) Determine the ratio of the object’s mass after the collision to its mass before the collision. (Note: The object is not a “fundamental particle”, and its mass is, therefore, subject to change.) (b) Does Kinetic energy increase or decrease?
In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.
(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.
Verify that the Chapter 2 formula applies in Example 3.4.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.