Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 3: Q30E (page 94)

A typical ionization energy - the energy needed to remove an electron—for the elements is 10 eV. Explain why the energy binding the electron to its atom can be ignored in Compton scattering involving an X-ray photon with wavelength about one-tenth of a nanometer

Short Answer

Expert verified

The energy binding the electron to its atom can be ignored because the energy of the photon is much greater than the binding

Step by step solution

01

Step.1: Concept Introcucution

We consider the energy of a photon E in terms of wavelength λas,

E=hcλ

Where hc = 1240 nm, E is energy, h is Planck’s constant, and speed of light is c

Hence,

E=(1240λnm)eV………………(1)

02

Step.2: Calculation of energy

Given that the photon wavelength is110thofnm

Use equation (1) and substitute the values,

E=1240110nmeV=12400eV

03

Step.3: Comparison with the binding energy

The ionization energy needed for an electron will be the same as the typical binding energy required in a Compton scattering which is given to be 10 eV.

Comparing this with the energy of a photon which is calculated as 12400 eV, the photon energy is orders of magnitude higher than the binding energy of 10 eV. Hence it can be ignored in Compton scattering.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A stationary muon μ- annihilates with a stationary antimuonμ+ (same mass, role="math" localid="1657587173645" 1.88×10-28 kg. but opposite charge). The two disappear, replaced by electromagnetic radiation. (a) Why is it not possible for a single photon to result? (b) Suppose two photons result. Describe their possible directions of motion and wavelengths.

Suppose we produce X-rays not by smashing electrons into targets but by smashing protons, which are far more massive. If the same accelerating potential difference were used for both, how would the cut off wavelengths of the two X-ray spectra compare? Explain.

Light of 300 nm wavelength strikes a metal plate, and photoelectrons are produced moving as fast as 0.002 c.(a) What is the work function of the metal? (b) What is the threshold wavelength for this metal?

From equations (3-4) to (3-6) obtain equations (3.8). It is easiest to start by eliminating φ between equations (3-4) and (3-5) using cos2φ+sin2φ = 1 The electron speed u may then be eliminated between the remaining equations.

An object moving to the right at 0.8c is struck head-on by a photon of wavelength λ moving to the left. The object absorbs the photon (i.e., the photon disappears) and is afterward moving to the right at 0.6c. (a) Determine the ratio of the object’s mass after the collision to its mass before the collision. (Note: The object is not a “fundamental particle”, and its mass is, therefore, subject to change.) (b) Does Kinetic energy increase or decrease?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Electricity and Magnetism

Read Explanation

Nuclear Physics

Read Explanation

Famous Physicists

Read Explanation

Radiation

Read Explanation

Rotational Dynamics

Read Explanation

Geometrical and Physical Optics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free