A photon scatters off of a free electron. (a) What is the maximum possible change in wavelength? (b) Suppose a photon scatters off of a free proton. What is the maximum possible change in wavelength now? (e) Which more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation--collision with an electron or collision with a proton?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The maximum possible change in wavelength of the electron is4.85×10-3m .

(b) The maximum possible change in wavelength of the proton is2.646×10-15m .

(c) The collision with an electron more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation.

Step by step solution

01

Significance of the change in the wavelength

The change in the wavelength is directly proportional to the Planck’s constant and the angle subtended by a particle. Moreover, the wavelength is inversely proportional to the light’s speed and the mass of an electron.

02

(a) Determination of the maximum possible change in the wavelength initially

During the scattering, the maximum wavelength change occurs at an angle of .

The equation of the maximum possible change in the wavelength of the electron is expressed as:

λ'-λ=hmeC(1-cosθ)

Here, role="math" localid="1657610341456" λ'-λis the maximum change in the wavelength, his the Planck’s constant, meis the mass of an electron and θis the angle subtended by the proton.

Substitute 6.63×10-34kg·m2/sforh,9.1×10-31kgforme,3×108m/sforcand180°

for θin the above equation.

role="math" localid="1657610242005" λ'-λ=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s9.1×10-31kg3×108m/s1-cos180°=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s2.73×10-22kg·m/s(1-(-1))=1.326×10-33kg·m2/s2.73×10-22kg·m/s=4.85×10-3m

Thus, the maximum possible change in wavelength of the electron is=4.85×10-3m .

03

(b) Determination of the maximum possible change in the wavelength finally

During the scattering, the maximum wavelength change occurs at an angle of180°.

The equation of the maximum possible change in the wavelength of the proton is expressed as:

λ'-λ=hmpc(1-cosθ)

Here, λ'-λis the maximum change in the wavelength, his the Planck’s constant, mpis the mass of an electron and θis the angle subtended by the proton.

Substitute 6.63×10-34kg·m2/sforh,1.67×10-27kgforme,3×108m/sforcand 180°

in the above equation.

λ'-λ=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s1.67×10-27kg3×108m/s1-cos180°=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s5.01×10-19kg·m/s(1-(-1))=1.326×10-33kg·m2/s5.01×10-19kg·m/s=2.646×10-15m

Thus, the maximum possible change in wavelength of the proton isrole="math" localid="1657610571650" 2.646×10-15m

04

(c) Determination of the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation

The collision with a particular electron more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation as the wavelength change in noticeable. In the wavelength of the proton, there is an insignificant wavelength change. The photon in the x-ray band mainly interacts with other proton as a wave function and also the scattered protons also have a same type of wavelength.

Thus, the collision with an electron more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A stationary muon μ- annihilates with a stationary antimuonμ+ (same mass, role="math" localid="1657587173645" 1.88×10-28kg. but opposite charge). The two disappear, replaced by electromagnetic radiation. (a) Why is it not possible for a single photon to result? (b) Suppose two photons result. Describe their possible directions of motion and wavelengths.

In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.

(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.

Compton used X-rays of 0.071nm wavelength. Some of the carbon’s electrons are too tightly bound to be stripped away by these X-rays, which accordingly interact essentially with the atom as a whole. In effect mein equation (3-8) is replaced by carbon’s atomic mass. Show that this explains why some X-rays of the incident wavelength were scattered at all angles.

A 0.065nmX-ray source is directed at a sample of carbon. Determine the minimum speed of scattered electrons.

A photon has the same momentum as an electron moving at106ms.

(a) Determine the photon's wavelength.

(b) What is the ratio of the kinetic energies of the two?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free