A beam of 500nm light strikes a barrier in which there is a narrow single slit. At the very center of a screen beyond the single slit, 1012photons are detected per square millimeter per second.

(a) What is the intensity of the light at the center of the screen?

(b) A secood slit is now added very close to the first. How many photons will be detected per square millineter per sec and at the center of the screen now?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Intensity I=0.3968Wm2

(b) Number of photons n=4×1012 photons per square millimeter per second.

Step by step solution

01

Given

The energy divided by the Planck constant is the number of photons per unit time.

Eh=n.f

Where E is the energy , h is planck’s constant , n is the no of photons and f is the fequency

Wavelength  λ=500nm1012 photonspermm2sec

02

Concept  used

The energy divided by the Planck constant is the number of photons per unit time.

Eh=n.f

Here, E is energy , h is plancks constant n is no of photons and f is frequency.

03

Energy of photon

a)

Trying to correlate the quantity of photons with their intensity is the main challenge. The two amounts are linearly proportionate to one another, as one might anticipate. We will apply this knowledge to solve for our unknowns in this situation and confirm the linear relationship as well. The intensity is defined as the total power per unit area.

The intensity(I) is defined as the total power (P) per unit area (A).

I=PA=nEAt=nhcAλt=1012photons×1240 nm.eV×1.6×1019JeV(1×103m)2×500nm×1s

Solve further as:

I=0.3968Wm2

To obtain the total energy of the incident photons, multiply by in equation (1). Additionally, as demonstrated in issue, use the valuable fact that eVnm in equation (3).

04

Determine the number of photon

b)

For further information on this subject, see problem 10. However, the number of slits is directly inversely related to the amplitude of the wave, or electric field. Consequently, the intensity that is traditionally determined by the following formula,

I=I0cos2ϕ2is proportional to the square of the amplitude, therefore it will be four times greater, and as a result, there will be four times as many photons. Consequently, considering the linear relationship between intensity and photon count.

n=4×1012 photons

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Compton used X-rays of 0.071nm wavelength. Some of the carbon’s electrons are too tightly bound to be stripped away by these X-rays, which accordingly interact essentially with the atom as a whole. In effect mein equation (3-8) is replaced by carbon’s atomic mass. Show that this explains why some X-rays of the incident wavelength were scattered at all angles.

In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.

(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.

The charge on a piece of metal can be "watched" fairly easily by connecting it to an electroscope, a device with thin leaves that repel when a net charge is present You place a large excess negative charge on a piece of metal, then separately shine light source of two pure but different colors at it. The first source is extremely bright, but the electroscope shows no change in the net change. The second source is feeble, but the charge disappears. Appealing to as few fundamental claims as possible, explain to your friend what evidence this provides for the particle nature of light.

Show that the laws of momentum and energy conservation forbid the complete absorption of a photon by a free electron, (Note: This is not the Photoelectric effect in the photoelectric effect, the electron is not free: the metal participates in momentum and energy conservation).

Consider two separate objects of unequal temperature. What would you do with them and what would have to happen thereafter to enable them to reach the same common temperature? Use this idea to explain why the electromagnetic radiation enclosed in a cavity has a temperature that is the same as that of the cavity walls.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free