A bedrock topic in quantum mechanics is the uncertainty principle. It is discussed mostly for massive objects in Chapter 4, but the idea also applies to light: Increasing certainty in knowledge of photon position implies increasing uncertainty in knowledge of its momentum, and vice versa. A single-slit pattern that is developed (like the double-slit pattern of Section 3.6) one photon at a time provides a good example. Depicted in the accompanying figure, the pattern shows that pho tons emerging from a narrow slit are spreadall-over; a photon's x-component of momentum can be any value over a broad range and is thus uncertain. On the other hand, the x -coordinate of position of an emerging photon covers a fairly small range, for w is small. Using the single-slit diffractionformula =wsinθ , show that the range of likely values of px, which is roughly psinθ , is inversely proportional to the range w of likely position values. Thus, an inherent wave nature implies that the precisions with which the particle properties of position and momentum can be known are inversely proportional.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The momentum in the x-direction is inversely proportional to the slit width. Hence, as the particle position uncertainty decreases (smaller slit width), the larger the uncertainty in its momentum.

Step by step solution

01

Given expressions

The single –slit diffraction formula=wsinθwhererole="math" localid="1660042499183" nis the number of node andλis the wavelength andw is the width.

px=psinθ

02

Concept de Broglie formula

The de Broglie formula for the relation between the momentum and the wavelength.

wsin(θ)=

Here,w is the width,n is number of node,λ is wave length andsin(θ) is the nature of wave.

03

Evaluate the relationship

Consider the de Broglie formula for the relation between the wavelength and the momentum.

wsin(θ)=p=hλwsin(θ)=nhppsin(θ)=px

Solve further as:

psin(θ)=nhwpx1w

Therefore, the momentum in the x-direction is inversely proportional to the slit width. This is because the particle position uncertainty decreases (smaller slit width), that corresponds to the larger the uncertainty in its momentum.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We analyze the photoelectric effect using photon energy alone. Why isn't the photon momentum a consideration? (It may help to reread the discussion of momentum and energy in connection with pair production.)

A 0.065nmX-ray source is directed at a sample of carbon. Determine the minimum speed of scattered electrons.

Light of wave length590nm is barely able to eject electrons from a metal plate. What would be the speed of the fastest electrons ejected by the light of one-third the wavelength?

Show that the angles of scatter of the photon and electron in the Compton effect are related by the following formula:

cotθ2=(1+hmcλ)tanϕ

In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.

(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free