Question: Atoms in a crystal form atomic planes at many different angles with respect to the surface. The accompanying figure shows the behaviors of representative incident and scattered waves in the Davisson-Germer experiment. A beam of electrons accelerated through 54 V is directed normally at a nickel surface, and strong reflection is detected only at an angle ϕof 500.Using the Bragg law, show that this implies a spacing D of nickel atoms on the surface in agreement with the known value of 0.22 nm.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

It is shown that D = 0.22nm .

Step by step solution

01

de Broglie’s formula

The de Broglie’s wavelength formula is λ=hmv.

02

Proof

Using the formula , V=h22mqλ2find the value of as follows:

54V=6.63×10-34J·s229.11×10-31kg1.6×10-19Cλ2λ2=6.63×10-34J·s2108V9.11×10-31kg1.6×10-19Cλ=6.63×10-34J·s108V9.11×10-31kg1.6×10-19Cλ=1.67×10-10m

From the figure, it is clear that the angle between the incident beam and atomic plate can be obtained as follows:

θ=90°-ϕ2=90°-50°2=90°-25°=65°

Using Bragg’s law, we have:

2dsinθ=mλd=mλ2sinθd=1×1.67×10-10m2×sin65°d=0.092nm

The angle between the planes and the crystal surface can be obtained as follows:

θ=90°-65°=25°

Now, by the sine law, we get:

sinθ=dDD=dsinθD=0.092nmsin25°D=0.22nm

Thus, it is proved that spacing has the value D of 0.22nm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle is “thermal” if it is in equilibrium with its surroundings – its average kinetic energy would be32kBT. Show that the wavelength of a thermal particle is given by

λ=h3mkBT

Question: An electron beam strikes a barrier with a single narrow slit, and the electron flux number of electrons per unit time per unit area detected at the very center of the resulting intensity pattern is . Next, two more identical slits are opened, equidistant on either side of the first and equally “illuminated” by the beam. What will be the flux at the very center now? Does your answer imply that more than three times as many electrons pass through three slits than through one? Why or why not?

Generally speaking, why is the wave nature of matter so counterintuitive?

Question: When we refer to a “bound” particle, we usually mean one for which there is no probability of finding it outside some finite confines. Could a bound particle be perfectly dead stationary, meaning a well-defined velocity of zero? Why or why not?

The top two plots in the accompanying diagram show a Gaussian wave functionψ(x)and its Fourier transformA(k). (a) How does theψ(x)plot demonstrate that the particle’s momentum is roughly(109m-1)h? (b) How does theA(k)plot demonstrate the same thing? (c) If you measured the particle’s momentum,(109m-1)hwould be a likely value. Would(0.9x109m-1)hbe a likely value? Would(1.1x109m1)h? Would(0.5x109m-1)h? (d) The bottom plots show two different Gaussian wave functions. Make sketches of their corresponding Fourier transforms.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free