A beam of particles, each of mass m and (nonrelativistic) speed v, strikes a barrier in which there are two narrow slits and beyond which is a bunk of detectors. With slit 1 alone open, 100 particles are detected per second at all detectors. Now slit 2 is also opened. An interference pattern is noted in which the first minimum. 36 particles per second. Occurs at an angle of 30ofrom the initial direction of motion of the beam.

(a) How far apart are the slits?

(b) How many particles would be detected ( at all detectors) per second with slit 2 alone open?

(c) There are multiple answers to part (b). For each, how many particles would be detected at the center detector with both slits open?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)In terms of the provided quantities, slit separation isd=hmv

(b)The number of electrons per second in a particular area for slit 2 can be either 16 electrons per second or 256 electrons per second.

(c)With both slits open, a signal was caught at the central detectoris either 196 or 676 electrons per second.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction

The special difference between constructive and destructive interference is that when the displacements of the waves that meet are in the same direction, whereas destructive interference occurs when displacements of the waves that meet are in the opposite directions.

02

Find Slit Separation.

(a)

We may find the slit separation in terms of the provided quantities by using the double-slit interference relation (m and v)

dsin(θ)=(n+12)λ

λ=hp

d=(n+12)hsin(θ)p

n=0, sin(30)=12, p=mv

d=hmv

03

Calculation of the counts for the slit 2

Let's look at the data in the problem: 100 electrons per second are observed with slit one alone open (the corresponding wave is.ψ1)However, with slit two open, 36 electrons per second are detected at the first minimum (the corresponding wave isψ2). When the two waves destructively interfere with each other, this minimum occurs(ψ12)

|ψ1|2100|ψ1|10

and

|ψD|236|ψD|±6

For destructive interference, we can write,

|ψD||ψ1||ψ2||ψ2||ψD|+|ψ1||ψ2|10±6

|ψ2'|2(16)2256

|ψ2''|2(4)216

The number of electrons per second in a particular area for slit 2 can be either 16 electrons per second or 256 electrons per second.

04

Center Detector

The constructive interference means the addition of the two-slit wave functions together. As we already have the amplitude of each wave we can directly find the total number of electrons detected per second in a given area for each case of part b).

Therefore, considering both possibilities discussed in part (b), we can write,

For|ψ2'|

|ψ12'|2(10+16)2(26)2676

For

|ψ12''|2(10+4)2(14)2256

05

Results

(a)In terms of the provided quantities, slit separation isd=hmv

(b) The number of electrons per second in a particular area for slit 2 can be either 16 electrons per second or 256 electrons per second.

(c) With both slits open, a signal was caught at the central detector is either 196 or 676 electrons per second.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If a laser pulse is of short enough duration, it becomes rather superfluous to refer to its specific color. How short a duration must a light pulse be for its range of frequencies to cover the entire visible spectrum? (The visible spectrum covers frequencies of -4.5to7.5×1014Hz.)

What is the wavelength of a neutron of kinetic energy 1MeV? Of kinetic energy20eV? (The difference is important for the fission of uranium, as a neutron will be more easily absorbed when its wavelength is very large compared with the dimensions of the wavelength behaves more like a diffuse wave than like a localized particle)

Question: When we refer to a “bound” particle, we usually mean one for which there is no probability of finding it outside some finite confines. Could a bound particle be perfectly dead stationary, meaning a well-defined velocity of zero? Why or why not?

Question: A classmate studies Figures 12 and 17, then claims that when a spot appears, its location simultaneously establishes the particle’s -component of momentum, according to the angle from center, and its position (i.e., at the spot). How do you answer this claim?

In Section 4.3, we claim that in analyzing electromagnetic waves, we could handle the fieldsandtogether with complex numbers. Show that if we define an "electromagnetic field"GE+icB, then the two of Maxwell's equations that linkEandB.(4-6c) and(4-6d) , become just one:

Gdl=ictGdA

Electromagnetic waves would have to obey this complex equation. Does this change of approach make EandB/or complex? (Remember how a complex number is defined.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free