A beam of particles, each of mass m and (nonrelativistic) speed v, strikes a barrier in which there are two narrow slits and beyond which is a bunk of detectors. With slit 1 alone open, 100 particles are detected per second at all detectors. Now slit 2 is also opened. An interference pattern is noted in which the first minimum. 36 particles per second. Occurs at an angle of 30ofrom the initial direction of motion of the beam.

(a) How far apart are the slits?

(b) How many particles would be detected ( at all detectors) per second with slit 2 alone open?

(c) There are multiple answers to part (b). For each, how many particles would be detected at the center detector with both slits open?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)In terms of the provided quantities, slit separation isd=hmv

(b)The number of electrons per second in a particular area for slit 2 can be either 16 electrons per second or 256 electrons per second.

(c)With both slits open, a signal was caught at the central detectoris either 196 or 676 electrons per second.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction

The special difference between constructive and destructive interference is that when the displacements of the waves that meet are in the same direction, whereas destructive interference occurs when displacements of the waves that meet are in the opposite directions.

02

Find Slit Separation.

(a)

We may find the slit separation in terms of the provided quantities by using the double-slit interference relation (m and v)

dsin(θ)=(n+12)λ

λ=hp

d=(n+12)hsin(θ)p

n=0, sin(30)=12, p=mv

d=hmv

03

Calculation of the counts for the slit 2

Let's look at the data in the problem: 100 electrons per second are observed with slit one alone open (the corresponding wave is.ψ1)However, with slit two open, 36 electrons per second are detected at the first minimum (the corresponding wave isψ2). When the two waves destructively interfere with each other, this minimum occurs(ψ12)

|ψ1|2100|ψ1|10

and

|ψD|236|ψD|±6

For destructive interference, we can write,

|ψD||ψ1||ψ2||ψ2||ψD|+|ψ1||ψ2|10±6

|ψ2'|2(16)2256

|ψ2''|2(4)216

The number of electrons per second in a particular area for slit 2 can be either 16 electrons per second or 256 electrons per second.

04

Center Detector

The constructive interference means the addition of the two-slit wave functions together. As we already have the amplitude of each wave we can directly find the total number of electrons detected per second in a given area for each case of part b).

Therefore, considering both possibilities discussed in part (b), we can write,

For|ψ2'|

|ψ12'|2(10+16)2(26)2676

For

|ψ12''|2(10+4)2(14)2256

05

Results

(a)In terms of the provided quantities, slit separation isd=hmv

(b) The number of electrons per second in a particular area for slit 2 can be either 16 electrons per second or 256 electrons per second.

(c) With both slits open, a signal was caught at the central detector is either 196 or 676 electrons per second.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An electron in an atom can "jump down" from a higher energy level to a lower one, then to a lower one still. The energy the atom thus loses at each jump goes to a photon. Typically, an electron might occupy a level for a nanosecond. What uncertainty in the electron's energy does this imply?

Question: A classmate studies Figures 12 and 17, then claims that when a spot appears, its location simultaneously establishes the particle’s -component of momentum, according to the angle from center, and its position (i.e., at the spot). How do you answer this claim?

Question: Atoms in a crystal form atomic planes at many different angles with respect to the surface. The accompanying figure shows the behaviors of representative incident and scattered waves in the Davisson-Germer experiment. A beam of electrons accelerated through 54 V is directed normally at a nickel surface, and strong reflection is detected only at an angle ϕof 500.Using the Bragg law, show that this implies a spacing D of nickel atoms on the surface in agreement with the known value of 0.22 nm.

Aman walks at1m/s, known to within an uncertainty (unrealistically small) of1μm/h.

(a) Compare the minimum uncertainty in his position to his actual physical dimension in his direction of motion 25cm,from front to back.

(b) Is it sensible to apply the uncertainty principle to the man?

Classically and nonrelativistically, we say that the energyEof a massive free particle is just its kinetic energy. (a) With this assumption, show that the classical particle velocityvparticleis2E/p. (b) Show that this velocity and that of the matter wave differ by a factor of 2. (c) In reality, a massive object also has internal energy, no matter how slowly it moves, and its total energyEisγmc2, whereγ=1/1-(vparticle/c)2.Show thatvparticleispc2/Eand thatvwaveisc2/vparticleIs there anything wrong with itvwave? (The issue is discussed further in Chapter 6.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free