Because we have found no way to formulate quantum mechanics based on a single real wave function, we have a choice to make. In Section 4.3,it is said that our choice of using complex numbers is a conventional one. Show that the free-particle Schrodinger equation (4.8) is equivalent to two real equations involving two real functions, as follows:

-2λ2Ψ1(x,t)m=Ψ2(x,t)tand

-2λ2Ψ2(x,t)m=Ψ1(x,t)t

where Ψ(x,t)is by definition Ψ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t). How is the complex approach chosen in Section4.3more convenient than the alternative posed here?

Short Answer

Expert verified

We should be able to recover the original Schrodinger equation using the two supplied equations, using the information thatΨ=Ψ1+iΨ2.

Step by step solution

01

Combining two partial differential equations.

So, as suggested in the section, combining the two partial differential equations into a single equation should greatly simplify our analysis. We should be able to reconstruct the original Schrodinger equation using the two supplied equations and the information thatΨ=Ψ1+iΨ2.

22m2Ψ1(x,t)x2=Ψ2(x,t)t

-22m2Ψ2(x,t)x2=Ψ1(x,t)t

Subtracting equation(1) from the equation (2), after multiplying it by i with equation(2).

22m-i2Ψ2(x,t)x2-2Ψ1(x,t)x2=iΨ1(x,t)t-Ψ2(x,t)t

-22m2Ψ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t)x2=iΨ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t)t

Ψ=Ψ1+iΨ2


-22m2Ψx2=iΨt

This is the same equation as in the section 4.3, we only have to solve one differential equation (for a complex function) rather than two differential equations (for real functions), which is a significant simplification given the cost of complexification.

02

Conclusion

Using Ψ=Ψ1+iΨ2we should be able to recover the original Schrodinger equation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: If a particle’s position uncertainty is zero, what can be said of its momentum uncertainty? If a particle’s position uncertainty is infinite, what can be said of its momentum uncertainty?

The diagram shows the Fourier transform A(k)of a Gaussian wave functionψ(x)that represents a reasonably well-localized particle.

(a) Determine approximate quantitative values for the wave function's wavelength and for the particle's position uncertainty.

(b) Can you determine the particle's approximate position? Why of why not?

If a laser pulse is of short enough duration, it becomes rather superfluous to refer to its specific color. How short a duration must a light pulse be for its range of frequencies to cover the entire visible spectrum? (The visible spectrum covers frequencies of -4.5to7.5×1014Hz.)

A beam of particles, each of mass m and (nonrelativistic) speed v, strikes a barrier in which there are two narrow slits and beyond which is a bunk of detectors. With slit 1 alone open, 100 particles are detected per second at all detectors. Now slit 2 is also opened. An interference pattern is noted in which the first minimum. 36 particles per second. Occurs at an angle of 30ofrom the initial direction of motion of the beam.

(a) How far apart are the slits?

(b) How many particles would be detected ( at all detectors) per second with slit 2 alone open?

(c) There are multiple answers to part (b). For each, how many particles would be detected at the center detector with both slits open?

Equation (4-21) expresses a function ψ(x)as a sum of plane waves, each with a coefficient A(k). Equation (4-22) finds the coefficients from the given functionψ(x) . The equations aren't independent statements; in fact, one is the inverse of the other. Equation (4-22) givesA(k)when ψ(x)is known, and (4-21) does the reverse. Example 4.7calculates A(k)from a specificψ(x). Show that when this A(k) is inserted into (4-21) , the original ψ(x)is returned. Use the Euler formula and the symmetry properties of odd and even functions to simplify your work.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free