Because we have found no way to formulate quantum mechanics based on a single real wave function, we have a choice to make. In Section 4.3,it is said that our choice of using complex numbers is a conventional one. Show that the free-particle Schrodinger equation (4.8) is equivalent to two real equations involving two real functions, as follows:

-2λ2Ψ1(x,t)m=Ψ2(x,t)tand

-2λ2Ψ2(x,t)m=Ψ1(x,t)t

where Ψ(x,t)is by definition Ψ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t). How is the complex approach chosen in Section4.3more convenient than the alternative posed here?

Short Answer

Expert verified

We should be able to recover the original Schrodinger equation using the two supplied equations, using the information thatΨ=Ψ1+iΨ2.

Step by step solution

01

Combining two partial differential equations.

So, as suggested in the section, combining the two partial differential equations into a single equation should greatly simplify our analysis. We should be able to reconstruct the original Schrodinger equation using the two supplied equations and the information thatΨ=Ψ1+iΨ2.

22m2Ψ1(x,t)x2=Ψ2(x,t)t

-22m2Ψ2(x,t)x2=Ψ1(x,t)t

Subtracting equation(1) from the equation (2), after multiplying it by i with equation(2).

22m-i2Ψ2(x,t)x2-2Ψ1(x,t)x2=iΨ1(x,t)t-Ψ2(x,t)t

-22m2Ψ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t)x2=iΨ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t)t

Ψ=Ψ1+iΨ2


-22m2Ψx2=iΨt

This is the same equation as in the section 4.3, we only have to solve one differential equation (for a complex function) rather than two differential equations (for real functions), which is a significant simplification given the cost of complexification.

02

Conclusion

Using Ψ=Ψ1+iΨ2we should be able to recover the original Schrodinger equation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 45, the case is made that the position uncertainty for a typical macroscopic object is generally so much smaller than its actual physical dimensions that applying the uncertainty principle would be absurd. Here we gain same idea of how small an object would have♦ to be before quantum mechanics might rear its head. The density of aluminum is 2.7×103kg/m3, is typical of solids and liquids around us. Suppose we could narrow down the velocity of an aluminum sphere to within an uncertainty of1μmper decade. How small would it have to be for its position uncertainty to be at least as large as110%of its radius?

Determine the Compton wavelength of the electron, defined to be the wavelength it would have if its momentum weremec.

The proton and electron had been identified by 1920, but the neutron wasn't found until 1932. Meanwhile, the atom was a mystery. Helium, for example, has a mass about four times the proton mass but a charge only twice that of the proton. Of course, we now know that its nucleus is two protons and two neutrons of about the same mass. But before the neutron's discovery, it was suggested that the nucleus contained four protons plus two electrons, accounting for the mass (electrons are "light") and the total charge. Quantum mechanics makes this hypothesis untenable. A confined electron is a standing wave. The fundamental standing wave on a string satisfies L=12λ, and the "length of the string" in the nucleus is its diameter.2Rnuc, so, the electron's wavelength could be no longer than about4RmucAssuming a typical nuclear radius of 4×10-15m determine the kinetic energy of an electron standing wave continued in the nucleus. (Is it moving "slow" or "fast"?) The charge of a typical nucleus is +20e , so the electrostatic potential energy of an electron at its edge would be-(1/2πε0)20e2/Rnuc(it would be slightly lower at the center). To escape. the electron needs enough energy to get far away, where the potential energy is 0. Show that it definitely would escape.

Experiments effectively equivalent to the electron double slit have been conducted in different, novel ways, producing obvious maxima and minima. Often the point is stressed that the intensity is extremely low. Why is this fact emphasized so much? How low is low enough to make the point?

How slow would an electron have to be traveling for its wavelength to be at least1 μm?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free