All other things being equal, which would be more likely to exhibit its wave nature—a proton or an electron—and why? By making something unequal, how could you “compensate,” so as to make one as wavelike as the other?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The electron is more wavelike than the proton, in accordance with the de Broglie relation, although they both display the same wave properties if the electron moves around 2000 times more slowly than the proton.

Step by step solution

01

The wavelength of a particle

The wavelength of a particle is given byλ=hp=hmv .

02

Explanation

Because of the inverse connection between wavelength and momentum provided by the de-Broglie equation, tiny objects are often more likely to display wave-nature. The concept is that in order to notice the wave characteristics in measurements, the objects must have more strong wave characteristics, which is the case for tiny particles like the electron. However, the wavelength is so narrow and difficult to notice for large objects.

According to their mass ratios, the proton will have a momentum 2000 times greater than the electron if we assume that both the electron and the proton are travelling at the same speed. However, we may deduce that the wavelength of the proton will be 2000 smaller than the wavelength of the electron.

We return to the de-Broglie equation to find that the wavelength decreases with increasing velocity in order to account for the change in wave nature. As a result, both particles will exhibit the same wave characteristic whether the proton can move 2000 times slower than the electron or, conversely, if the electron can move 2000 times faster than the proton.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Example 4.2. neither|Ψ|2nor|Ψ|are given units—only proportionalities are used. Here we verify that the results are unaffected. The actual values given in the example are particle detection rates, in particles/second, ors-1. For this quantity, let us use the symbol R. It is true that the particle detection rate and the probability density will be proportional, so we may write|Ψ|2= bR, where b is the proportionality constant. (b) What must be the units of b? (b) What is|ΨT|at the center detector (interference maximum) in terms of the example’s given detection rate and b? (c) What would be|Ψ1|,|Ψ1|2, and the detection rate R at the center detector with one of the slits blocked?

The energy of a particle of massbound by an unusual spring isβ/2m+bx4.

(a) Classically. it can have zero energy. Quantum mechanically, however, though bothx andpare "on average" zero, its energy cannot be zero. Why?

(b) Roughly speaking.Δxis a typical value of the particle's position. Making a reasonable assumption about a typical value of its momentum, find the particle's minimum possible energy.

A mosquito of mass 0.15mgis found to be flying at a speed of 50cm/swithin an uncertainty of 0.5mm/s.(a) How precisely may its position be known? (b) Does this inherent uncertainty present any hindrance to the application of classical mechanics?

Calculate the ratio of (a) energy to momentum for a photon, (b) kinetic energy to momentum for a relativistic massive object of speed u, and (e) total energy to momentum for a relativistic massive object. (d) There is a qualitative difference between the ratio in part (a) and the other two. What is it? (e) What are the ratios of kinetic and total energy to momentum for an extremelyrelativistic massive object, for whichuc?limδx0 What about the qualitative difference now?

Equation (4-21) expresses a function ψ(x)as a sum of plane waves, each with a coefficient A(k). Equation (4-22) finds the coefficients from the given functionψ(x) . The equations aren't independent statements; in fact, one is the inverse of the other. Equation (4-22) givesA(k)when ψ(x)is known, and (4-21) does the reverse. Example 4.7calculates A(k)from a specificψ(x). Show that when this A(k) is inserted into (4-21) , the original ψ(x)is returned. Use the Euler formula and the symmetry properties of odd and even functions to simplify your work.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free