What is the range of frequencies in a 1 ns pulse of

(a) 1060nmInfrared laser light and

(b) 100MHzRadio waves?

(c) For which is the "uncertainty" in frequency, relative to its approximate value, larger?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a). Δf7.9×107s-1 is the range of frequencies in a 1ns pulse of 1060nm infrared laser light.

(b). Δf7.9×107s-1is the range of frequency.

(c). For radio waves, the uncertainty in frequency relative to its approximate value is larger.

Step by step solution

01

Concept of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and formula of the speed of light, frequency, wavelength

Using uncertainty principleEth2

Where,Eis the uncertainty in energy,tis the uncertainty in time,his Planck’s

constant.

Formula used,

c=λf

where, is the speed of light, fis the frequency,λis the wavelength.

02

Use Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle for calculation.

(a)

Time

t=1ns=1×10-9s

Wavelength

λ=1060nm=1060×10-9m

Therefore,

Eth2hfth2π2hfth4πft14πf14πt

Plugin the values

f14π1×10-90.079×1097.9×107s-1

f7.9×107s-1is the range of frequencies in a 1ns pulse of 1060nm infrared laser light.

03

Use Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle for calculation.

(b)

Time

t=1nst=1×10-9s

Frequency

f=100MHzf=100×106Hz

Therefore,

Eth2hfth2π2hfth4πft14πf14πt

Plugin the values

f14π1×10-90.079×1097.9×107s-1f7.9×107s-1

f7.9×107s-1 is the range in frequencies a 1ns pulse of 1060nm infrared laser light.

04

Use the formula  for calculation.

(c)

For infrared laser light.

Substitute the given value in the equation

f=cλf=3×1081.06×10-6f=2.83×1014s-1

The relative size of uncertainty in frequency to the approximate frequency can be find as:

Δff=7.96×101s-12.83×1014s-1ff=2.81×10-7

For radio waves

ff=7.96×10's-11×108s-1ff=0.796

For radio waves, the uncertainty in frequency relative to its approximate value is 2.81×10-7while for infrared laser light the uncertainty in frequency relative to its approximate value is 0.796.

Therefore, uncertainty in frequency relative to its approximate value is larger for radio waves.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Moon orbits Earth at a radius of 3.84×108m. To do so as a classical particle. Its wavelength should be small. But small relative to what? Being a rough measure of the region where it is confined, the orbit radius is certainly a relevant dimension against which to compare the wavelength. Compare the two. Does the Moon indeed orbit as a classical particle? (localid="1659095974931" mEarth=5.98×1024kgand mmoon=7.35×1022kg)

The proton and electron had been identified by 1920, but the neutron wasn't found until 1932. Meanwhile, the atom was a mystery. Helium, for example, has a mass about four times the proton mass but a charge only twice that of the proton. Of course, we now know that its nucleus is two protons and two neutrons of about the same mass. But before the neutron's discovery, it was suggested that the nucleus contained four protons plus two electrons, accounting for the mass (electrons are "light") and the total charge. Quantum mechanics makes this hypothesis untenable. A confined electron is a standing wave. The fundamental standing wave on a string satisfies L=12λ, and the "length of the string" in the nucleus is its diameter.2Rnuc, so, the electron's wavelength could be no longer than about4RmucAssuming a typical nuclear radius of 4×10-15m determine the kinetic energy of an electron standing wave continued in the nucleus. (Is it moving "slow" or "fast"?) The charge of a typical nucleus is +20e , so the electrostatic potential energy of an electron at its edge would be-(1/2πε0)20e2/Rnuc(it would be slightly lower at the center). To escape. the electron needs enough energy to get far away, where the potential energy is 0. Show that it definitely would escape.

In Section 4.3, we claim that in analyzing electromagnetic waves, we could handle the fieldsandtogether with complex numbers. Show that if we define an "electromagnetic field"GE+icB, then the two of Maxwell's equations that linkEandB.(4-6c) and(4-6d) , become just one:

Gdl=ictGdA

Electromagnetic waves would have to obey this complex equation. Does this change of approach make EandB/or complex? (Remember how a complex number is defined.)

All other things being equal, which would be more likely to exhibit its wave nature—a proton or an electron—and why? By making something unequal, how could you “compensate,” so as to make one as wavelike as the other?

A crack between two walls is 10 cmwide. What is the angular width of the central diffraction maximum when

(a) an electron moving at 50 m/spasses through?

(b) A baseball of mass0.145 kg and speed 50 m/spasses through?

(c) In each case, an uncertainty in momentum is introduced by the “experiment” (i.e., passing through the slit). Specifically, what aspect of the momentum becomes uncertain, and how does this uncertainty compare with the initial momentum of each?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free