Question: An electron beam strikes a barrier with a single narrow slit, and the electron flux number of electrons per unit time per unit area detected at the very center of the resulting intensity pattern is . Next, two more identical slits are opened, equidistant on either side of the first and equally “illuminated” by the beam. What will be the flux at the very center now? Does your answer imply that more than three times as many electrons pass through three slits than through one? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

The number of electrons detected in the middle region will be nine times more than the number detected at the single slit since the flux is proportional to the number of slits squared. The initial beam intensity, or the quantity of electrons assaulted each second, is maintained

Step by step solution

01

The wavelength of a particle 

The wavelength of a particle can be obtained using the formula λ=hp=hmv.

02

Explanation

There is more destructive and beneficial interference between matter waves as the number of slits rises. As a result, the combined amplitude of additional matter waves increases (remember how a diffraction grating is compared to a double slit in terms of the interference pattern). Now, much like the intensity and the electric field , the probability density is proportional to the wave amplitude squared ψ2.

Consequently, when the wave amplitude triples, the probability density will increase by 9 times, which will be seen on the screen as 9 more electrons striking the same region per second, or flux.

It is important to note that the initial beam intensity (the number of electrons assaulted per second of the beam) has not changed; the only change we have made is to increase the number of slits. However, this has changed how the electrons are distributed across the screen; as a result, more of them are now restricted to smaller regions.

Therefore, to balance off the destructive interference and preserve the overall amount of energy, the constructive interference occurred, and as we can see, it does so in a non-linear (squared) way.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An electron in an atom can "jump down" from a higher energy level to a lower one, then to a lower one still. The energy the atom thus loses at each jump goes to a photon. Typically, an electron might occupy a level for a nanosecond. What uncertainty in the electron's energy does this imply?

Question: If a particle’s position uncertainty is zero, what can be said of its momentum uncertainty? If a particle’s position uncertainty is infinite, what can be said of its momentum uncertainty?

In Section 4.3, we claim that in analyzing electromagnetic waves, we could handle the fieldsandtogether with complex numbers. Show that if we define an "electromagnetic field"GE+icB, then the two of Maxwell's equations that linkEandB.(4-6c) and(4-6d) , become just one:

Gdl=ictGdA

Electromagnetic waves would have to obey this complex equation. Does this change of approach make EandB/or complex? (Remember how a complex number is defined.)

A beam of electrons strikes a crystal at an angleθwith the atomic planes, reflects of many atomic planes below the surface, and then passes into a detector also making angleθwith the atomic planes. (a) If the minimumθgiving constructive interference is.35° What is the ratioλ/d, Where is the spacing between atomic planes? (b) At what other angles, if any, would constructive interference occur?

All other things being equal, which would be more likely to exhibit its wave nature—a proton or an electron—and why? By making something unequal, how could you “compensate,” so as to make one as wavelike as the other?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free