The maximum height of a cylindrical column is limited by the compressive strength of the material; if the compressive stress at the bottom were to exceed the compressive strength of the material, the column would be crushed under its own weight. (a) For a cylindrical column of height \(h\) and radius \(r,\) made of material of density \(\rho,\) calculate the compressive stress at the bottom of the column. (b) since the answer to part (a) is independent of the radius \(r,\) there is an absolute limit to the height of a cylindrical column, regardless of how wide it is. For marble, which has a density of $2.7 \times 10^{3} \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\( and a compressive strength of \)2.0 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{Pa},$ find the maximum height of a cylindrical column. (c) Is this limit a practical concern in the construction of marble columns? Might it limit the height of a beanstalk?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The compressive stress at the bottom of a cylindrical marble column is calculated as σ = hρg, where h is the column height, ρ is the density of the marble, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The maximum height of such a column is determined by the point at which the compressive stress equals the marble's compressive strength. In the case of a marble column, the calculated maximum height is 7338.8 meters. However, other factors such as stability and environmental conditions may influence the column construction in practice. The compressive strength is not the main limiting factor for a beanstalk's height, as it has different support and water transportation mechanisms compared to a marble column.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the compressive stress at the bottom of the column

To calculate the compressive stress, we need to find the force acting on the bottom of the column due to the weight of the material above it. Then, divide this force by the cross-sectional area of the column. The volume of the column \(V\) can be calculated as \(V = \pi r^2 h\). Then, we can calculate the mass of the column \(m\) using the density formula \(m = V \rho\). Now, we can calculate the weight of the column \(W\) using the formula \(W = mg\), where \(g\) is the acceleration due to gravity. Finally, we can calculate the compressive stress \(\sigma\) by dividing the weight by the cross-sectional area: \(\sigma = W / A\). The cross-sectional area of the column \(A = \pi r^2\).
02

Calculate the compressive stress at the bottom of the column using the equations from Step 1

Now we can plug in the equations from Step 1 to calculate the compressive stress: \(\sigma = \frac{W}{A} = \frac{mg}{\pi r^2} = \frac{(\pi r^2 h \rho)g}{\pi r^2} = h \rho g\) We found that the compressive stress at the bottom of the column is independent of the radius, and only depends on the height, density, and acceleration due to gravity.
03

Find the maximum height of a marble column

For a marble column, we have the density \(\rho = 2.7 \times 10^3 \, \mathrm{kg/m^3}\) and compressive strength \(\sigma_\mathrm{max} = 2.0 \times 10^8 \, \mathrm{Pa}\). To find the maximum height, we need to solve the equation: \(\sigma_\mathrm{max} = h_\mathrm{max} \rho g\) Rearrange the equation to solve for \(h_\mathrm{max}\): \(h_\mathrm{max} = \frac{\sigma_\mathrm{max}}{\rho g}\) Plug in the values for \(\rho\), \(g\), and \(\sigma_\mathrm{max}\), to find the maximum height: \(h_\mathrm{max} = \frac{2.0 \times 10^8 \, \mathrm{Pa}}{(2.7 \times 10^3 \, \mathrm{kg/m^3})(9.81 \, \mathrm{m/s^2})} \approx 7338.8 \, \mathrm{m}\)
04

Discuss if the limit is a practical concern in the construction of marble columns and if it might limit the height of a beanstalk

The maximum height of a marble column we found is 7338.8 meters, which is much taller than any existing or planned building. It means that the compressive strength limit is not a practical concern when constructing marble columns. However, other factors such as stability, wind, and earthquakes might still be concerns in practice. As for a beanstalk, although plants are not built with marble, it could be interesting to consider whether such a height limit could apply. In a beanstalk, support and water transportation would be important factors, so it is not directly comparable to a marble column. However, it can be noted that the extreme height found is an indication that the compressive strength might not be the main limiting factor for a beanstalk's height either.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the maximum load that could be suspended from a copper wire of length \(1.0 \mathrm{m}\) and radius \(1.0 \mathrm{mm}\) without breaking the wire? Copper has an elastic limit of \(2.0 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{Pa}\) and a tensile strength of \(4.0 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{Pa}\).
A horizontal spring with spring constant of \(9.82 \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{m}\) is attached to a block with a mass of \(1.24 \mathrm{kg}\) that sits on a frictionless surface. When the block is 0.345 m from its equilibrium position, it has a speed of \(0.543 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}\) (a) What is the maximum displacement of the block from the equilibrium position? (b) What is the maximum speed of the block? (c) When the block is \(0.200 \mathrm{m}\) from the equilibrium position, what is its speed?
A \(0.50-\mathrm{kg}\) object, suspended from an ideal spring of spring constant \(25 \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{m},\) is oscillating vertically. How much change of kinetic energy occurs while the object moves from the equilibrium position to a point \(5.0 \mathrm{cm}\) lower?
Show, using dimensional analysis, that the frequency \(f\) at which a mass- spring system oscillates radical is independent of the amplitude \(A\) and proportional to Whim. IHint: Start by assuming that \(f\) does depend on \(A\) (to some power).]
The leg bone (femur) breaks under a compressive force of about $5 \times 10^{4} \mathrm{N}\( for a human and \)10 \times 10^{4} \mathrm{N}$ for a horse. The human femur has a compressive strength of \(1.6 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{Pa},\) while the horse femur has a compressive strength of $1.4 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{Pa} .$ What is the effective crosssectional area of the femur in a human and in a horse? (Note: since the center of the femur contains bone marrow, which has essentially no compressive strength, the effective cross- sectional area is about \(80 \%\) of the total cross-sectional area.)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free