Calculate the equivalent inductance \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\) of two ideal inductors, \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2},\) connected in series in a circuit. Assume that their mutual inductance is negligible. [Hint: Imagine replacing the two inductors with a single equivalent inductor \(L_{\mathrm{cq}} .\) How is the emf in the series equivalent related to the emfs in the two inductors? What about the currents?]

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The equivalent inductance of two ideal inductors connected in series is the sum of their individual inductances, \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} = L_{1} + L_{2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Write down the expression for the emf induced in each inductor and Faraday's law

The emf induced in an inductor is given by \(E = -L\frac{dI}{dt}\), where \(L\) is the inductance and \(\frac{dI}{dt}\) is the rate of change of current with time. According to Faraday's law, the total emf \(E_{\mathrm{tot}}\) is the sum of the emfs induced by the two inductors. So, we have: \(E_{\mathrm{tot}} = E_{1} + E_{2} = -L_{1}\frac{dI}{dt} - L_{2}\frac{dI}{dt}\)
02

Write down the expression for the emf induced in the equivalent inductor

If we replace the two inductors with a single equivalent inductor \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\), the emf induced in this inductor is given by: \(E_{\mathrm{eq}} = -L_{\mathrm{eq}}\frac{dI}{dt}\)
03

Relate the emf in the equivalent inductor to the emfs in the two inductors

Since the mutual inductance between the two inductors is negligible, the emf induced in each inductor doesn't affect the other, which means that we can safely replace the inductors with an equivalent one, as long as the total emf remains unchanged. So, we have: \(E_{\mathrm{eq}} = E_{\mathrm{tot}}\)
04

Write down the expression for the current through each inductor

Since the inductors are connected in series, the current flowing through them is the same, which means that: \(I_{1} = I_{2} = I\)
05

Find the equivalent inductance

Now, we can use the relationship between emfs to find the equivalent inductance: \(-L_{\mathrm{eq}}\frac{dI}{dt} = -L_{1}\frac{dI}{dt} - L_{2}\frac{dI}{dt}\) Divide both sides by \(- \frac{dI}{dt}\): \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} = L_{1} + L_{2}\) So, the equivalent inductance \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\) of the two ideal inductors connected in series is the sum of their individual inductances.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A coil has an inductance of \(0.15 \mathrm{H}\) and a resistance of 33 \(\Omega\). The coil is connected to a 6.0 - \(V\) battery. After a long time elapses, the current in the coil is no longer changing. (a) What is the current in the coil? (b) What is the energy stored in the coil? (c) What is the rate of energy dissipation in the coil? (d) What is the induced emf in the coil?
(a) For a particle moving in simple harmonic motion, the position can be written \(x(t)=x_{\mathrm{m}}\) cos \(\omega t .\) What is the velocity \(v_{x}(t)\) as a function of time for this particle? (b) Using the small-angle approximation for the sine function, find the slope of the graph of \(\Phi(t)=\Phi_{0} \sin \omega t\) at \(t=0 .\) Does your result agree with the value of \(\Delta \Phi / \Delta t=\omega \Phi_{0} \cos \omega t\) at \(t=0 ?\)
A step-down transformer has a turns ratio of \(1 / 100 .\) An ac voltage of amplitude \(170 \mathrm{V}\) is applied to the primary. If the primary current amplitude is \(1.0 \mathrm{mA},\) what is the secondary current amplitude?
Calculate the equivalent inductance \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\) of two ideal inductors, \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2},\) connected in parallel in a circuit. Assume that their mutual inductance is negligible. [Hint: Imagine replacing the two inductors with a single equivalent inductor \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} .\) How is the emf in the parallel equivalent related to the emfs in the two inductors? What about the currents? \(]\)
A 2 -m-long copper pipe is held vertically. When a marble is dropped down the pipe, it falls through in about 0.7 s. A magnet of similar size and shape takes much longer to fall through the pipe. (a) As the magnet is falling through the pipe with its north pole below its south pole, what direction do currents flow around the pipe above the magnet? Below the magnet (CW or CCW as viewed from the top)? (b) Sketch a graph of the speed of the magnet as a function of time. [Hint: What would the graph look like for a marble falling through honey?]
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free